The Promise of Nostalgia
Looking to a golden past can be just as useful as dreaming of a chrome-plated future
July/August 1998
Jay Walljasper Utne Reader
The word nostalgia implies an escape to a rosy past that never
actually existed--a fantasy time when the skies were never cloudy,
the lilacs were always in bloom, and hopelessly romantic dreams
routinely came true.
RELATED CONTENT
The Unbearable Lightness of Adulthood July August 2004 By Anjula Razdan Reflections on turning 30 ...
In a Family Way Two guys, two unruly kids, and a lesson in hilarious love January February 2003 By...
Bill Clinton's broken promise of a politics of meaning exacerbated the cynical individualism of the...
Yet British psychiatrist Trevor Turner points out in The New
Internationalist (Nov. 1997) that nostalgia entered our
language as a medical term describing the psychological condition
of soldiers who had spent too much time away from home. The word
comes from the Greek nostos (return home) and algos
(pain). 'Treatises were written on the symptoms and diagnosis, the
causes and treatments,' Turner writes. 'It was agreed that...the
only effective management was the nostos, the journey back
home.'
That something treated as a depressive disorder as recently as
World War II can today be dismissed as a silly, sentimental mood
says much about how we view the world. A trip back home now seems
as impossible as travel to the moon once did. It's almost
guaranteed that the place where you grew up, the campus where you
went to school, the spot where you first whispered 'I love you' to
your future mate doesn't look the same anymore. We don't have any
expectations of the past being there for us--nostalgia has morphed
from a longing for home to a hopeless pining for never-never
land.
Leaders in universities, the media, and business have always
been dismissive of nostalgia, even the harmless sentimental
variety, notes Rutgers University historian Jackson Lears. 'For
centuries,' he writes in Lingua Franca (Dec. 1997), 'it's
been the bete noire of every forward-thinking intellectual, right,
left, or center.'
That's because it defies the modern ideology of Progress--the
cherished belief that the future always represents an improvement
over the past. 'From the viewpoint of American liberal
intellectuals,' Lears writes, 'nostalgic people suffered from a
failure of nerve: They refused the challenges of modern industrial
society, taking refuge in dreams of lost innocence.' Conservatives,
Lears adds, take an equally dim view of anyone pondering if the
world might have been better in some ways before the advent of
global, corporate capitalism.