Wanderers by Choice
Exile was once the worst punishment. Now it?s a glamorous adventure.
July/August 2000
Eva Hoffman Utne Reader
Since Adam and Eve left the Garden of Eden, is there anyone who
does not, in some way, feel like an exile? We feel ejected from our
first homes and landscapes, from our first romance, from our
authentic self. An ideal sense of belonging, of attuning with
others and ourselves, eludes us.
RELATED ARTICLES
Riding the rails is easier on the earth than flying, and should be way more fun...
The economy is out of sight. Unimaginable luxury is all around. America rules the world. So why is ...
Historically, the symbolic meaning and experience of exile have
changed. In medieval Europe, it was the worst punishment possible,
because people's identities were defined by their role and place in
society. This implied a highly charged concept of home--although
home did not necessarily mean birthplace. For medieval clerics, it
was the city that housed the papal seat. Jews nurtured a powerful
idea of home that existed on two levels: the real communities they
inhabited and 'Israel,' which became an imaginative center from
which they derived their essential identity.
In recent years, great shifts in the political and social
landscape have affected the very notion of exile. Cross-cultural
movement has become the norm, which means that leaving one's native
country is not as dramatic or traumatic as it used to be. The ease
of travel and communication, combined with the looser borders,
gives rise to endless crisscrossing streams of wanderers and guest
workers, nomadic adventurers and international drifters. Many are
driven by harsh circumstance, but the element of choice is there
for most.
People who leave the former Soviet Union nowadays are likely to
be economic migrants or Mafia tax dodgers rather than dissidents
expelled by ruthless state power. One Bengali village has a
tradition of long migrations: Many men leave for years or even
decades, but always intend to return. They are not powerless
victims of globalization; smart young men choose different
countries for the economic advantages they offer. Almost all go
back, a bit richer and more important in the eyes of their fellow
villagers.
The Herald Tribunerecently characterized the increasing
number of American expatriates in Europe: 'They are the Americans
abroad, and their number is soaring in a time when travel is
unblinkingly routine, communications easy and instant, and
telecommuting a serious option. They are abroad in a world where
they can watch the Super Bowl live from a Moscow sports bar or send
an e-mail from an Internet café in Prague.'
Page: 1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
Next >>