August 1, 2001
Al Paulson
The Money Defense Shield,
RELATED ARTICLES
Money isn't simple, and neither is its history...
Axis of Influence Behind the Bush Administration's Missile Defense Revival August 7, 2002 Issue By ...
Foreign aid and resource conservation will protect us more than missiles...
It?s time for activists to shed their distaste for the dollar...
Five years into the Iraq debacle, national security has been reduced to an election slogan that pai...
Paul Rogat
Loeb,
The Christian Science Monitor
When Paul Loeb, author of
Soul of a Citizen: Living With
Conviction in a Cynical Time (1999, St. Martin's), was asked to
speak to a group of Lockheed Martin employees a few years ago, he
was hesitant. But, though not a big advocate of the Military
Industrial Complex, he decided to go ahead and speak as honestly as
possible. During the course of his speech he outlined some very
eye-opening facts. For instance, that the average American pays
over $200 per year to finance Lockheed Martin's government
contracts. And that Seattle-based Boeing alone 'had more staffers
in its DC lobbying office than the entire DC staff of Washington
State's Congressional and Senatorial delegations combined.' In a
recent op-ed for
The Christian Science Monitor,
Loeb's argues forcefully that the Bush administration's plans for a
missile defense shield are not about national defense at all.
Rather, he contends, the whole boondoggle is meant to guarantee the
continued streams of public money that line the pockets of the
defense contractors. Why else would 'weapons producers have spent
over $40 million in the last two years on campaign contributions
and lobbying,' as Loeb points out?
--Al PaulsonGo there>>