Spoiling the Party?
Why are Greens running a candidate against Paul Wellstone, the Senate's most liberal member?
September/October 2002
Jay Walljasper Utne Reader
Denunciations of Minnesota's Green Party have appeared all over the
national alternative press this election season, as pundits who
normally aim their rhetorical firepower at right-wingers and
corporate criminals are up in arms that the state's growing band of
Greens is fielding a candidate against progressive champion Paul
Wellstone in an extremely tight Senate race. Pointing to the role
Ralph Nader's Green candidacy played in sending George W. Bush to
the White House, magazines from the leftist
RELATED CONTENT
Greens Should Use ?Safe States? Strategy in 2004 July 11, 2003 Ted Glick ZNet Writing for ...
Refresh my memory. Didn't you guys endorse Nader?...
Nation to the
liberal
American Prospect worry that this latest experiment
in political purity could tip the U.S. Senate to the
Republicans.
Despite a moving appeal from Nader's two-time running mate Winona
LaDuke to not challenge Wellstone, delegates at the party's May
convention nominated Native American activist Ed 'Eagle Man' McGaa
for the Senate seat. For many Greens, Wellstone's support of a bill
authorizing President Bush's war on terrorism was a major
issue-although a largely symbolic one, since the measure passed
with only one dissenting vote. But as
The Alternet News
Service (June 3, 2002) and
The Progressive (July 2002)
point out, McGaa does not even share the Greens' views about the
war. 'As a Korean War vet,' reports
The Progressive's
political editor Ruth Conniff, 'he says he believes constructive
military intervention is sometimes warranted.'
McGaa is not considered a particularly strong or sophisticated
candidate, a view reinforced by his suggestion that Wellstone might
not survive the election due to his health. Wellstone announced
earlier this year that he has a mild form of multiple sclerosis,
but on the campaign trail this year he displays the same fire that
fueled his stunning 1990 upset of two-term Republican Rudy
Boschwitz. But this time Wellstone is the two-termer fighting to
win back some people's trust after overriding a 1990 campaign
promise to serve no more than two terms.
This is the biggest obstacle he faces in the race against
Republican nominee Norm Coleman, a newly minted right-winger who
defected from Minnesota's Democratic Farmer-Labor (DFL) Party while
serving as mayor of St. Paul. Coleman is a formidable campaigner,
and polls this summer showed him and Wellstone in a statistical
dead heat with McGaa pulling a significant 3 percent of the
vote.
Wellstone's reelection is important to hopes of turning back George
Bush's conservative onslaught-and not just because of his
near-perfect progressive voting record and pivotal position in a
deadlocked Senate. Through 12 years in the Senate and many more as
an activist, Wellstone has pioneered a style of politics with
lessons for any progressive who wishes to someday be part of a
political majority in America. He brings a spirit of populism to
electoral politics, emphasizing economic and environmental issues
in a way that appeals beyond the usual liberal circles: to
veterans' groups, to voters in farm country, blue-collar suburbs,
and mining and lumber and factory towns.
Page: 1 |
2 |
3 |
Next >>