Genuine National Security
(Page 2 of 2)
March / April 2003
Craig Cox Utne magazine
This strategy ties into Lovins? three-pronged approach to
protecting Americans from attack:
RELATED CONTENT
Parks in Peril May / June 2003 Staff Utne magazine America?s 10 most endangered national pa...
While it’s common knowledge that the U.S. Department of Homeland Security (DHS) bungled its respons...
16 ways Americans can feel truly safe again.......
Spies might miss the Cold War, but they’re getting plenty of work tracking activists...
- Conflict avoidance/prevention. Lovins stresses
?justice, hope, transparency, tolerance, and honest government? as
the most cost-effective ways to maintain our national security?a
strategey he calls ?presponse.? By sincerely promoting these values
around the world, the United States can prevent regional conflicts,
which often threaten American interests. War and terrorism can also
be prevented by more effective use of global resources, which can
help people attain a decent life without consuming massive amounts
of contested commodities such as fossil fuels and fresh water.
- Conflict resolution. If conflict cannot be
avoided, the United States must be more willing to use
international avenues of mediation, such as the United Nations and
the International Court of Justice, to prevent armed
hostilities.
- Nonprovocative defense. Lovins points to
Sweden?s military as a model of a powerful but strictly defensive
force. Its artillery cannot be fired beyond Sweden?s territorial
waters, its aircraft are designed for short-range deployment, and
its radio frequencies are incompatible with those of both NATO and
the Warsaw Pact. ?They?ve sought to make Sweden a country you don?t
want to attack,? Lovins explains. ?This approach can ultimately
create a [situation where] each side?s defense is stronger than the
other side?s offense.?
Lovins admits that such a defensive approach would not stop a
small-scale terrorist strike. Of course, neither would a national
missile defense system. But taken together, a national defense
strategy that embraces humanitarian aid, more effective use of
resources, conflict mediation, and a powerful defense would
certainly take the United States a lot further down the road toward
true security than our current strategy, which promises nothing but
an endless war against an endless succession of enemies.
Page:
<< Previous 1 | 2 |