Greens Should Use ?Safe States? Strategy in 2004
July 11, 2003
Ted Glick ZNet
Writing for Z Magazine, Ted Glick shows a way for the
Green Party to avoid spoiling Democrat chances while maintaining
the benefits of fielding a progressive candidate for president.
Glick writes that the danger of having ?21st-century corporate
warmongers and fascists in positions of power within the White
House, Pentagon, [and] Justice Department? requires a ?safe states
strategy,? focusing the Green campaign on states where past voting
history and polling show that either Bush or a Democrat are very
likely to win. Advantages include Greens gaining respect from
Democrats, an increase in the possibility of the Greens achieving 5
percent of the national vote, and a continued nurturing of ?the
shoots and seedlings of a viable progressive party.? Should the
Greens buckle to pressure not to run a candidate, Glick warns, they
could go the way of an earlier third-party movement, the
once-powerful Populist Party, which in 1896 threw its support to
Democrat William Jennings Bryan. By 1900, the party had virtually
disappeared.
?Joel Stonington
RELATED CONTENT
Places the United States has Bombed November 18, 2002 Erica Sagrans Places the United Stat...
A Dossier on Civilian Victims of United States' Aerial Bombing of Afghanistan: A Comprehensive Ac...
Voting against the world on exporting arms...
What political cause could put Canadian lefties on the same side of the picket line as American ult...
Go there>>
Green Party ?Safe States? Strategy
Related Links:
Related Links from the Utne Archive: