Is Lucre Really That Filthy?
It?s time for activists to shed their distaste for the dollar
July / August 2003
Craig Cox Utne magazine
Nothing so vividly describes my brief and confusing stint as a
revolutionary in the latter half of the ?70s as the lingering
recollection of feeling enthusiastic and proud about being
broke.
RELATED ARTICLES
Is your life like this, too?...
European Gas Protests: People Are Learning Interesting Lessons From the Blockades September 19...
Behind the Scenes in DC September 2005 By Nina Utne Ed. note Utne editor in chief, Nina Utne, was a...
Canada's railyard Rembrandts create art that moves...
My $50-a-week job editing the local co-op newspaper left me with
money for rice and beans after the rent was paid, but not much
else. Of course, my young comrades weren?t exactly rolling in the
dough, either. But that was OK, because we didn?t need filthy
lucre. We?d constructed an entire community around the idea of
voluntary poverty, a bubble in the local economy that contained all
our wildest sociopolitical fantasies. We had community-controlled
food co-ops, worker-owned restaurants and clothing stores, co-op
housing, and a people?s clinic, everything good revolutionaries
needed to sustain themselves for the long battle ahead. Everything
except money.
This distaste for the dollar, of course, was nothing new.
Yippies Jerry Rubin and Abbie Hoffman made headlines in the ?60s by
scattering bills on the floor of the New York Stock Exchange and
starting a near riot. In Howl!, Allen Ginsberg wrote of
burning all his money in a wastebasket.
Ginsberg, of course, sold his papers to Stanford University for
nearly a million bucks. And though my literary output will never
attract that much attention, I have somehow managed over the years
to attain a life that, in the parlance of my former comrades, can
only be called bourgeois. I own a house, for instance, and a car.
It is, by almost any measure, a comfortable life?in many ways the
kind of life coveted by the very people my former anti-bourgeois
comrades and I were fighting to ?liberate.?
This irony was often lost on the revolutionaries of my day, a
point made bluntly by Theodore Roszak in his seminal 1969 book,
The Making of a Counter Culture: ?What, after all, does
social justice mean to the outcast and dispossessed? Most
obviously, it means gaining admission to everything from which
middle-class selfishness excludes them.? Then, as now, progressives
needed to deal with their own phobias about money if they really
wanted to do the work of social change for any length of time?and
with any degree of success. If you insist on embracing poverty in
your own life, how do you become a credible advocate for folks who
would do almost anything to escape it?