Commons Sense
An ancient legal principle can help us protect the environment
November / December 2003
Craig Cox Utne magazine
Right-wing Republicans are eviscerating environmental
protections everywhere with such apparent ease that even landmark
legislation such as the Clean Air Act seems powerless as a defense.
Investigative reporter Mark Dowie writes in Orion
(July/Aug. 2003) that the public may be better served by invoking
the ancient Public Trust Doctrine rather than specific laws in
their fight to save the environment.
RELATED ARTICLES
The atmosphere and oceans, the air waves and sky, public squares, peace, quiet, open space, the Int...
More Conversation Instigations July August 2002 Issue By Joseph Hart, Utne Reader Like grunge rock...
Safeguarding the Information Commons April 28, 2003 Anne Geske Utne.com ?For democracy to f...
The doctrine, which dates to Roman times, establishes the right
of public benefits over private property, Dowie explains, and has
been used effectively throughout the past century to protect public
water and land rights in several high-profile cases, including the
controversial 1983 Mono Lake decision. In that case, the California
Supreme Court cited the Public Trust Doctrine in its ruling against
the Los Angeles Department of Water and Power, which had been
drawing water from streams feeding Mono Lake, threatening the
surrounding ecosystem.
Since then, threats to the publicly held commons have only grown
more intense, expanding from environmental issues to include
everything from broadcasting waves and intellectual property to
genetic cloning. 'Given all these invasions, and potential
invasions, there are reasons to believe that the Public Trust
Doctrine may have an increasingly important role to play in
defending those aspects of our environment that rightfully belong
to all of us,' Dowie writes.
But in order for supporters of the commons to prevail in these
struggles, they must take the Public Trust Doctrine outside the
courtroom as well. It's unlikely that it will be effective without
a higher level of citizen activism and public education, Dowie
explains. 'And why shouldn't a broad spectrum of people come out to
protest the rampant enclosure of the commons that is unfolding
today?' he asks. 'It seems to me that this doctrine, and the whole
notion of an expanded commons, should be able to transcend the
traditional right-left, public-private divisions that have long
plagued debate over property and the commons.'
-- Craig Cox