November 20, 2009
UTNE READER

Philanthropists Fall Short

Why many philanthropists are not social reformers

Article Tools
Bookmark and Share

Social reform on almost any front requires fresh ideas coupled with financial backing. Philanthropic foundations should be well positioned to deliver both, but do they? In Whole Earth (Fall 2002), investigative reporter Mark Dowie says the supposed white knights of philanthropy often come up short.

RELATED CONTENT

With government agencies facing budget cuts and in many cases reporting to conservatives, private foundations have great potential to promote solutions to serious social problems, says Dowie. But the author of the groundbreaking book American Foundations: An Investigative History (MIT Press) contends that philanthropists too often act as a “drag anchor” on real reform. Though they may be good at giving one-shot cash injections to small nonprofit groups when emergencies arise, they typically revert to funding their high-profile “SOB” standbys—the symphony, opera, and ballet.

The public, however, is starting to catch on. For one thing, many now know that so-called private foundations aren’t so private after all, given that up to half their assets would have gone to the public via taxes had the foundation not been created. In Dowie's view, it's more accurate to think of foundations as “quasi-public/private institutions.” Thus, the more democratically they’re run, the better.

To that end, Dowie thinks foundations could stand a little anti-trust action: “I'd break up the big ones,” he says, thus opening their boards to new viewpoints. He’d also pressure foundations to adopt a more critical stance toward the corporations in which they invest. At one point the nation's leading environmental grant maker, Pew Charitable Trust, for instance, “was earning more money in dividends from the nation’s largest polluters than they were giving to the environmental movement.” Though a lot of institutional resistance remains, Dowie believes it would be a step in the right direction if foundations started engaging in proxy fights or reinvested their endowments in ways that complemented their missions.
Jacqueline White

Comments

Add Your Comment

We’d like to know what you think. To comment, please use this form. E-mail addresses are never displayed on comments, but they are required to confirm your comments. First time registrants: You will receive an email confirming your email address. Once you confirm, your comment will be posted. Questions about our comments policy? Click here.

Line breaks and paragraphs are automatically converted — no need to use <p> or <br> tags.

New to Utne Reader?
Sign up to share comments.
Asterisks(*) indicate required fields.
Name*
Your name appears next to your comment.

E-mail Address*
This will be your login ID.

City State Zip Code

Password*


Confirm Password*

Comments
1500 character limit (Offensive materials and/or spam will be removed, no HTML allowed)
Please Note: Your sign-up must be verified via e-mail before your comment is published.


Pay Now & Save $6!
First Name: *
Last Name: *
Address: *
City: *
State/Province: *
Zip/Postal Code:*
Country:
Email:*
(* indicates a required item)
Canadian subs: 1 year, (includes postage & GST). Foreign subs: 1 year, . U.S. funds.
Canadian Subscribers - Click Here
Non US and Canadian Subscribers - Click Here
Want to gain a fresh perspective? Read stories that matter? Feel optimistic about the future? It's all here! Utne Reader offers provocative writing from diverse perspectives, insightful analysis of art and media, down-to-earth news and in-depth coverage of eye-opening issues that affect your life.

Save Even More Money By Paying NOW!

Pay now with a credit card and take advantage of our Earth-Friendly automatic renewal savings plan. You save an additional $6 and get 6 issues of Utne Reader for only $29.95 (USA only).

Or Bill Me Later and pay just $36 for 6 issues of Utne Reader!