The Touch of Corruption
(Page 2 of 2)
May 2004
Jon Spayde Utne.com
It didn't happen. The state's contract with what was now
ES&S didn't allow outsiders to examine the software used in the
machines. Such software has been judged in court to be the private
property of the voting-machine companies -- ruling out all vetting
of it by governmental or party bodies suspecting fraud.
RELATED CONTENT
Lombardi's Web July August 2004 By Nick Stillman An artist reveals the networks of power and money...
Why forgiveness is so difficult in the age of apology.......
The Art of the Nap Web Specials Archives Aristides The American Scholar I had on gray wool t...
An enemy of conventional wisdom and a sage against the machine...
A groundswell of alarm about the voting-machine situation has
been spreading from state to state, with California going so far as
the ban the use of many Diebold machines in the fall election
because of security concerns. But the potential threat to the
democratic process may get worse before it gets better. 'Many of
the new elections contracts give the responsibility for counting
the votes not to election officials but to the companies [that]
built and maintain the machines,' Niman writes. 'In other words,
the most sacred and tenuous process in U.S. democracy, counting the
votes, has been outsourced.'
Related Links:
Page:
<< Previous 1 | 2 |