False Ads: There Oughtta Be A Law! Or -- Maybe Not
The First Amendment and the Federal Communications Act protect political ads
September 16, 2004
Brooks Jackson Factcheck.org
'Candidates have a legal right to lie to voters just about as
much as they want,' writes Brooks Jackson, director of the
Annenberg Political Fact Check. There are laws that protect
consumers from misleading product pitches, but few laws to protect
voters from misleading campaign ads. Miss Cleo, the TV psychic, was
fined $5 million and forced to pay $500 million to callers to her
telephone psychic service, callers who were under the impression
they were getting a 'free reading.'
RELATED CONTENT
What it really takes to be a sustainable tourist...
By Craig Cox
Percentage increase in the amount of land under coca cultivation in Colombia since 19...
Can cities and states boycott rogue regimes?...
Widely hailed as a miracle crop, Jatropha's vaunted status began to fade....
So what happened when 1998 Ohio gubernatorial candidate Bob Taft
aired an ad falsely accusing his rival Lee Fisher of 'cutting
crime-fighting employees by 15%?' The bipartisan Ohio Elections
Commission did everything right: they met and made a speedy
decision well before the election -- they ruled that Bob Taft's ad
was in violation of the state law against false campaign ads. And
then they issued their punishment: a letter of reprimand. Taft won
the election.
Situations like this occur all over the country, and Jackson
reports that it's because of a combination of the First Amendment's
guarantee of free speech and the Federal Communications Act, which
says that if a broadcaster airs one candidate's ad, it must air the
opponent's ad as well. This means networks are legally bound to air
ads, even when the ads contain lies or outrageous content. Jackson
provides the appalling example of J.B. Stoner's 1972 ad in Atlanta,
Georgia, which contained free and gleeful uses of racial slurs. The
FCC forced Atlanta broadcasters to air the ad.
Does the First Amendment guarantee candidates the right to say
whatever they want? Yes, says Brooks Jackson. The Supreme Court
ruled in 1971 that 'it can hardly be doubted that the
constitutional guarantee (of free speech) has its fullest and most
urgent application precisely to the conduct of campaigns for
political office.' We all agree that freedom of speech is extremely
important in America, but, Jackson writes, it has made it very
difficult for states to make and enforce laws about campaign
ads.