Death in Darfur and a Distracting Debate
(Page 2 of 2)
February 24, 2005
Hannah Lobel Utne.com
That leaves
both sides at a standstill. Sudan is not a party to the ICC,
and therefore any action by the court would need to be ordered by
the UN Security Council (which the United States, and perhaps
China, would likely veto).
RELATED CONTENT
Five years into the Iraq debacle, national security has been reduced to an election slogan that pai...
Breast Cancer Activism Moving Beyond the Mammography Debate August 12, 2002 Issue By Julie Madsen ...
The Great Debate: Bush vs. Bush May 19, 2003 Jon Stewart Comedy Central It?s common knowled...
SpinWatch exposes Congress of Racial Equality as front group with ties to Monsanto...
Science and religion aren't the only two ways to view the world...
The
Convention
on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide --
which the United States ratified in 1988 -- commits signatory
states 'to prevent and to punish' genocide. The United States and
United Nations have mired themselves in how to punish, when the far
more important command is to prevent.
Go there >>
Darfur and the Genocide Debate (article excerpt)
Related Links:
Related Links from the Utne
Archive:
Comments? Story tips?
Write a letter to the editor
Like this? Want more?Subscribe to Utne
magazine
Page:
<< Previous 1 | 2 |