Farmers and the Poor Lose Again at WTO Meeting
Transparency and development give way to the same old corporate agenda at the Hong Kong trade talks
December 29, 2005
Leif Utne Utne.com
The
trade summit in Hong Kong from December 13-18 ended pretty much
as expected -- with a vague face-saving agreement to keep talking.
The
conference declaration agreed to by trade ministers and hailed
by the World Trade Organization as a major victory was in fact the
result of an elaborate dance through a week of strong-arm backroom
dealing surrounded by carefully orchestrated political theater.
RELATED CONTENT
America's Two Faces at Trade Meeting September 2003 Ben Lilliston Utne.com The United State...
For the majority of middle-aged and older men experiencing problems getting and maintaining erectio...
You Cruise, You Lose June 27, 2003 Hal Clifford Grist Taking a cruise is a great way to imp...
Could Zapatistas Lose Out to President Fox in War of Ideas? December 15, 2000 Amanda Luker ...
'The declaration was deliberately kept minimalist to avoid
another failure like Cancun,' reads a
post-conference analysis by the Institute for Agriculture and Trade
Policy. 'In fact, the agreement is so watered down it is hard
to determine what impact it will have. Most of the work is still to
be done.'
In the end, say WTO critics, the world's farmers and poor people
lost out, while US and European corporations won big, extracting
major concessions from developing countries on trade in services
and industrial products. 'Total failure of the [current] WTO Doha
round [in Qatar in 2001] was averted,' Indian activist
Vandana Shiva writes on ZNet, 'by the fig leaf of
withdrawal of export subsidies in agriculture by 2013 (while most
of the $400 billion subsidies of the rich country industrialized
corporatized agriculture will remain) and the fig leaf of
'aid-for-trade.''
The WTO took pains to give the ministerial the appearance of
greater transparency than previous gatherings, publishing, for
example, statistics like the number of cups of coffee trade
ministers drank during the final late-night negotiating session
(350).
Director-General Pascal Lamy even posted daily diary entries to
a blog on the WTO website, embellishing with cute personal touches
like 'B+B for lunch (I mean bread and bananas, of course).'
But despite the trappings of openness and transparency, nothing
was left to chance, reports
Martin
Khor of the Penang, Malaysia-based Third World Network. At the
carefully-choreographed closing session:
'Chairs were arranged theatre-style, with no tables in front of
delegates or microphones or the name card of the countries. There
were no standing microphones either in the aisles. A more
participation-unfriendly arrangement would be hard to imagine.'
Meanwhile, thousands marched in the streets outside the
convention center chanting 'Down, down WTO!' More than 800
protesters, mostly South Korean rice farmers, were arrested after a
scuffle with police. Yet according to Khor, the only dissenting
voices that will make it into the WTO's official record of the
conference belonged to delegates from Venezuela and Cuba, who
walked onto the stage during the closing session and demanded that
they be allowed to speak.