Fair Trade?
(Page 2 of 2)
March 16, 2006
Evan Noetzel Utne.com
Forsyth, attempting to appeal to 'foreign-policy realists,'
responds to this impasse with the contention that beyond the
standing moral imperative posed by Darfur, the Bush administration
should rally the world to intervene based on national interest.
'The United States must push harder ... for a meaningful military
response to Darfur,' Forsyth argues, 'not just to save the lives of
innocents, to atone for sitting on its hands during the Rwandan
genocide, and to live up to its ideals, but also to thwart the rise
of its strategic competitor in Africa -- an ascendance that could
undermine US interests on the continent.'
RELATED CONTENT
A Swedish Folk Sensation Walks into a Hotel . . ....
The racial and sexual politics of Caribbean “beach boys” and “big bamboo”...
Media Missing New Evidence About Genoa Violence January 22, 2003 Issue By Fairness and Accuracy in ...
World?s First Fair Trade Town July 21, 2003 John Vidal Guardian.co.uk Garstang, a small tow...
Trade liberalization threatens human rights with policies and bullets...
Go there >>China
in Africa: The New Imperialism?
Go there, too >>
Realism and Darfur: Area of Interest
Related Links:
Related Links from the Utne
Archive:
Comments? Story tips?
Write a letter to the editor
Like this? Want more?Subscribe to Utne
magazine
Page:
<< Previous 1 | 2 |