Reimagining Reality
(Page 2 of 3)
July / August 2006
Annie Nocenti
Consider a few examples. Interview with the Assassin
(2002) was presented as a documentary about a 'second gunman' in
the assassination of President John Kennedy. For a viewer not
versed in the 'mockumentary,' which uses the documentary form to
tell a fictional story, it is possible to watch the film for a
while and believe it's true. A documentary that explores the
manipulation inherent in documentary filmmaking with much darker
ramifications is The Wonderful, Horrible Life of Leni
Riefenstahl (1993). While making Olympia in 1936, Riefenstahl
shot the Olympic games by staging events and using narrative
techniques. She shot high divers doing flips and ran some of the
footage backward for better effect. Is this still documentary, if
you cheat shots to get to the poetic grace of a dive?
RELATED CONTENT
Before reimagining our politics, we have to learn to trust one another—at least a little bit....
When we read about the middle-class squeeze, we tend to think blue collar—the machinist who used to...
There's more to life than the pursuit of private splendor...
A visionary California theater company unveils a new kind of calendar...
Riefenstahl's 1935 film Triumph of the Will is
considered a masterpiece of Nazi propaganda. This is perhaps the
most dangerous example of the persuasive power of documentary. On
the other end of the spectrum is the light, innocent manipulation
in the recent hit Winged Migration. 'The footage of flying along on
the wingtip of a bird,' Wilson points out, 'is of a bird that has
been, from the day it hatched, used to people and cameras flying
with it.'
'The stuff that is the most interesting and the most fertile to
me are the films in which not only do I not know what is real, but
I move past not knowing into not caring,' says Wilson. 'House
of the Tiger King (2004) is a fantastic example. To this day I
have no idea where the truth of the story leaves off and the
fiction of it begins.' House of the Tiger King follows an explorer
who thinks he's found a map to a lost city of gold in Peru and the
documentary filmmaker who travels with him. 'They run out of food
and film, and in the end, maybe this explorer got there, maybe he
didn't,' says Wilson. 'There are indications that certain things
have been fabricated.' But the film's director, David Flamholc, has
called it a documentary.
Werner Herzog has long been fascinated with the membrane between
what is real and what isn't. His mockumentary Incident at Loch
Ness (2004) explores this theme, and Fitzcarraldo
(1982) portrays an impossible task that became the director's
obsession.
'In making a movie about a crazy man carrying a boat up a
mountain, you actually carry a boat up a mountain,' says
Wilson.
With the line between truth and fiction blurring in such
fascinating ways, does the viewer require a more sophisticated
perspective? 'I'd love to see more media literacy taught in
school,' says Wilson. 'We need to be able to watch films and think
critically about them, question their accuracy and perspective. You
have to open up your mind for something that is true and false at
the same time. But you can't police. You can't make rules for the
filmmakers.'
Danish director Lars von Trier, who with Thomas Vinterberg was
responsible for Dogme '95, a set of satirical rules for filmmaking,
has come up with the 'Dogumentary' rules for documentaries. 'There
are five instructions,' explains Wilson. 'One is to allow for
feedback from the subject at the end of the movie-a required 90
seconds for the subject to talk about how he or she feels about
being in the movie.'