Walking Test Tubes
(Page 2 of 3)
July / August 2006
Sonia Shah from NACLA Report on the Americas
The tests also can violate the ethical standards that protect
subjects in rich countries.
RELATED CONTENT
How retracing a prophet's journey could advance Mideast peace...
Walking Against Breast Cancer June 30, 2003 Leif Utne Utne.com Since August of 1999, breast...
Fabio Gets His Walking Papers January 14, 2002 Sara V. Buckwitz Fabio Gets His Walking Pa...
The Geek Purity Test June 4, 2003 Erin Ferdinand Utne.com Growing up in a Minneapolis subur...
A case in point was a proposed 2001 trial for a drug aimed at
treating premature babies with respiratory distress syndrome.
Biotech drug company Discovery Laboratories, unable to find
experimental subjects in the United States, planned to test its new
drug through a placebo-controlled experiment in a poor hospital in
Latin America. The company would give 325 deathly ill premature
infants placebos instead of life-saving medicines widely available
in the United States and Europe.
In the United States, where the FDA already had approved four
similar drugs, such a trial would have been ethically and
practically impossible. The drugs, after all, reduce mortality in
lung-impaired infants by 34 percent. The company feared the new
drug would prove no more effective than those of its competitors,
and thus wanted to test it against a placebo. It wasn't that
Discovery's drug would be much better; it would simply be easier to
manufacture, and therefore cheaper.
The FDA discussed the proposed trial in a session titled 'Use of
Placebo-Controls in Life Threatening Diseases: Is the Developing
World the Answer?' The proposed subjects of the trial were poor and
lacked access to the lifesaving medicines, the FDA reasoned, so the
trial would pass muster-despite the 17 preventable deaths that
Discovery estimated would result.
In that case, pressure from the watchdog group Public Citizen
forced the company to redesign the trial. But generally, ethics
violations pass unnoticed. 'For the most part,' acknowledged
Gustavo Kaltwasser, who monitors trials in Latin America for the
Olympia, Washington-based oversight body the Western Institutional
Review Board, 'medical ethics committees [in the region] are not
aware of . . . FDA regulations and ignore even their own country's
regulations. They don't know it's in their power to suspend or
terminate research or ask for more protection for subjects.'