Cosmic Questions
An ethicist considers law and order on the final frontier
November / December 2006
Patrick Lin Nanoethics Group
Not since Neil Armstrong set foot on the moon in 1969 has there
been such a buzz about space exploration. With the promise of
commercial space travel just over the horizon, traveling the cosmos
will no longer be limited to an elite group of highly educated,
disciplined astronauts; the average Joe can, for the first time,
truly reach for the stars. Lost in all the excitement, however, is
a host of ethical dilemmas that, if they are not considered soon,
could end up aborting our journey before it really begins.
RELATED CONTENT
Tunes to get you dancing in your moon boots...
How one woman channeled her sexual desire into a higher love...
When President Bush holds one of his rare press conferences, full of softball questions and non-ans...
What questions to ask in the quest for ethical seafood....
Given what we've done to our own planet, a natural first step is
to ask whether or not we should be encouraging private space
exploration in the first place. An overdeveloped sense of
nationalism could lead to a space war, and ignoring the cumulative
effects of seemingly small acts could quickly lead to
overcommercialization and pollution. The militarization of space is
also a worry, given our history of making new technologies into
weapons and carrying old conflicts over into new lands.
We've already littered our outer atmosphere with floating debris
that spacecraft and satellites need to navigate around, and we've
abandoned equipment on the moon and on other planets. So what
safeguards are in place to ensure that we don't exacerbate this
problem, especially if we propose to increase space traffic? Are we
prepared to risk accidents in space, especially given the danger
level of certain technologies, such as nuclear power?
If space is commercialized, then property claims-by governments,
corporations, and individuals-will need to be made in order to
operate various ventures without interference (lawsuits have
already been filed on Earth to lay claim to such things as
asteroids). We also need to consider what it will mean to actually
'own' parts of space. Is our relationship with space one of
'positive community of ownership,' in that we each own an equal
share in space and its contents? If so, several other questions
arise. To illustrate the point, imagine there are only eight people
alive on Earth and only eight other planets in our solar system: Do
we each get our own planet or one-eighth of each planet? And how do
we account for future people-must we factor in their legacy before
we can claim our shares?
On the other hand, if our relationship to space is one of
'negative community of ownership,' then no one has a prima facie
claim to the property in question. In other words, no one owns
anything yet, so we share a common starting point of zero. This
raises the question of how it is possible to gain ownership.
Page: 1 |
2 |
3 |
Next >>