First Resorts
When you're choosing where to ski or snowboard, follow your ecoconscience
November / December 2006
Keith Goetzman Utne Reader
High on a mountain, with a dome of blue overhead, rugged peaks
all around, and acres of snow-covered terrain underneath, it's easy
for skiers and snowboarders to feel deeply in tune with nature:
just them and gravity, a pure sport in a pristine environment. For
an increasing number of downhill snow sport lovers, however, it's
impossible to ignore the reality that their good time is actually
pretty hard on the natural world.
RELATED CONTENT
Hitching a ride to the bus stop...
The role business schools played in the economic crisis....
The publication date is March 27th, although we're told to expect the book in stores somewhat soone...
epiphanies, rants, and other thoughts...
Many skiers get to the mountains in CO2-burning planes and cars.
Chairlifts, grooming machines, and chalets consume lots of energy,
as do snowmaking machines, which also gulp huge amounts of water.
Ski areas often expand, cutting deeper into wilderness, usually on
public land, and proposals are always being floated for new areas.
Factor in the relentless real estate development that follows, with
its focus on slopeside luxury living, and the downsides are
many.
'The environmental effects of ski areas just suck in general,'
says Lisa Ruoff, a snowboarder who lives near Carbondale, Colorado,
halfway between the ski meccas of Aspen and Vail. 'A green ski area
is kind of an oxymoron.'
So what's a green skier or snowboarder to do? Luckily, there are
ways to keep feeding your passion while you take action to lessen
your impact on those mountains you love.
The best ecoresource for people who ski in the western United
States is the Ski Area Citizens' Coalition, a project of several
western environmental groups. The coalition evaluates and grades
ski areas from A to F based on their environmental policies and
practices, and posts results on its
website. A key consideration is the size of a
resort's footprint on the land, and terrain expansions are
evaluated based on their impact. The coalition also considers such
factors as a resort's energy sources, its water use, its protection
of wildlife and wildlife habitat, and its support for 'sound'
environmental policies.
For nearly three decades, U.S. skier numbers have been stagnant,
growing less than one-tenth of a percent a year. And yet what is
sometimes called the 'ski area arms race' for more terrain
continues as resorts try to lure customers with superlatives. A
recent newspaper ad for Colorado's Vail-owned Breckenridge resort
touts '150 new acres of expert-only terrain, a new eight-passenger
gondola, and the highest lift in North America.' And the resort's
new slogan verges on self-parody: 'The perfect mountain town just
got more perfect.' The Ski Area Citizens' Coalition disagrees,
giving Breckenridge an F.
Page: 1 |
2 |
3 |
Next >>