Infinity or Bust
As NASA scientists struggle with an image problem, swashbuckling entrepreneurs are selling space as the ultimate free market. Is it fool's gold?
November / December 2006
Hannah Lobel Utne Reader
In the 1998 action extravaganza Armageddon, an asteroid
the size of Texas is barreling toward Earth and the suits at NASA
are scrambling for a fix.
RELATED CONTENT
Americans are as punitive as they can afford to be.......
Death Warmed Over July/August 2001 Craig Cox Utne Reader Looking for a way to bring humor an...
Sometimes a woman's best friend is a crazy bitch...
The U.S. government turns up the heat on Freon smugglers.......
'For 30 years they questioned the need for NASA,' drawls Billy
Bob Thornton as the space agency's tough-talking administrator in a
situation-room pep talk. 'Today, we're going to give them the
answer.'
As those who sat through the blockbuster know-and the movie's
$553.7 million worldwide gross suggests there were many of us-the
venerable NASA comes up short. The planet's only hope, it turns
out, is to plant a nuclear warhead deep within the asteroid, and
the only folks who can do that are a crew of oilmen led by a
roughneck entrepreneur. Deemed ludicrous eight years ago, certain
aspects of the film's plot-which is decidedly pro-business macho,
anti-egghead science-don't seem as preposterous today. In a
collection of stories in Forbes earlier this year, a new
breed of entrepreneurs laying the groundwork for commercial space
flight were dubbed 'Space Cowboys.' One of the magazine's
commentators suggested that if these guys were in charge of the
country's space program, we'd probably be on Mars by now.
It's not a particularly risqu? assessment, given NASA's recent
history of expensive and sometimes tragic failures. Some 50 years
after Sputnik launched us into the Space Age, the space shuttle
evokes little more than a sigh of relief when it returns safely.
President Bush's 2004 announcement that he was sending us back to
the moon and then to Mars rang hollow-a president facing a quagmire
overseas making a desperate play for his Kennedy moment. But is
space as a public endeavor so far gone that the only hope of
realizing our decades-old dreams is to fling open the gates to a
cosmic Wild West?
Space has been open for business for decades,
with satellite-dependent industries, such as communications and
global positioning systems, pulling in billions. During the Reagan
era, even NASA's charter, which initially highlighted the pursuit
of knowledge and national prestige, was rewritten to include the
mandate to 'seek and encourage, to the maximum extent possible, the
fullest commercial use of space.'
The satellite market has since plateaued. Today's space
enthusiasts say the new path to profit is tourism that will truly
be out of this world. And the media have chimed in with breathless
stories about 'the final frontier' which, roughly translated, means
'free market.'
The buzz started in 2001, when a company called Space Adventures
negotiated a spot for millionaire Dennis Tito aboard a Russian
rocket heading to the International Space Station. The $20 million
vacation caused an uproar at NASA, which blocked Tito from training
at the Johnson Space Center. Greg Klerkx, author of Lost in
Space: The Fall of NASA and the Dream of a New Space Age
(Pantheon, 2004), describes the incident as just one more
protectionist misstep on the part of the agency. Elite NASA types
may have considered Tito a cosmic carpetbagger, but the public
identified with a man who was opening up space to the rest of
us.
Page: 1 |
2 |
3 |
Next >>