Will Royalty Fees Kill the Internet Radio Stars?
New royalty rates could pull the plug on online radio stations
March 8, 2007
Mary O'Regan Utne.com
Internet radio has been around for almost as long as the
internet. Like many web trends, it started out as a resource for
in-the-know computer geeks. Now, roughly 52 million people are
tuning in on a monthly basis, according to a study by
Arbitron and Edison Media Research (pdf).
Listeners are attracted to the commercial-free programs and diverse
music selection, and artists love the additional outlet for their
music. But a new Copyright Royalty Board decision pushed by the
Recording Industry
Association of America (RIAA), a trade group representing most
mainstream record labels, might turn good old rock 'n' roll into
cold, hard static.
RELATED ARTICLES
Does a tiny station in Nashville signal the future of community radio?...
Surfing the Waves: Radio thrives on the Web Web Specials Archives Utne Reader Will radio be ...
The radio documentary boom has people talking...
Efforts to launch progressive radio networks are underway. Can they beat Limbaugh at his own game?...
At the beginning of the month, the board announced a hefty hike
in the cost of royalties paid by internet radio stations.
Radio and Internet Newsletter reports
that, effective retroactively through the beginning of 2006,
online stations will be required to pay $.0008 per song, per
listener. The amount jumps to $.0011 for 2007 and $.0014 the
following year, with an annual minimum of $500 for each
channel.
For indie stations such as
Radio
Paradise, the new royalty rates are devastating. Founder Bill
Goldsmith writes on
SaveOurInternetRadio.com, 'We are now liable
for royalties, retroactive to the beginning of 2006, that are
equal to approximately 125 percent of our income.' According to
Goldsmith, the problem began in the late '90s when Congress
ruled that analog and digital broadcasts are not the same thing.
'Members of Congress (who at that time had no idea how this
whole digital thing worked) accepted it at face value, and
agreed that it was only fair that digital broadcasts be subject
to additional copyright fees' -- fees that terrestrial radio
stations owned by companies like Clear Channel don't face.
Page: 1 |
2 |
3 |
Next >>