Losing the War on Terror
(Page 3 of 3)
September 27, 2007
Brendan Mackie Utne.com
Well I certainly hope so. Part of the reason why we wrote the
book is in the hope that by showing people what has happened,
people will realize that there are much smarter ways to fighting
terror without the negative consequences of the
play-tough/act-tough mentality of the Bush administration.
RELATED CONTENT
The Permanent War March April 2005 By Michael Fitzgerald Militarism and the American way of life I...
The Radical Middle September October 2004 By Leif Utne They're pragmatic. They're idealistic. And ...
An ode, of sorts, to former New York mayor Rudy Giuliani...
So you're more play-smart, think-smart?
Yeah, and already there's been some pushback on a number of the
administration's worst excesses. On torture, they had to retract
the torture memo. On [the UN Convention against Torture and Other
Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment], Congress
rejected the administration's interpretation of that treaty to not
apply to foreigners outside of the United States. The Supreme Court
rejected their view that the Geneva conventions don't apply. On the
National Security Agency's warrantless wiretapping program, a court
held it unconstitutional [and ?ordered the program] terminated.
There has also been a lot of pushback since the Democrats came
to power, I think as a result of [popular] dissatisfaction with
Iraq. We need to build on that if we're going to try to restore
America to anything like the status it had before 9/11.
How much do you think newspaper-reading civilians know
about the war on terror?
A lot of what we know has only been disclosed by virtue of
leaks. No one really knows how much is still behind closed
doors.
Related Links from the Utne Reader Archive:
Comments? Story tips?
Write a letter to the editor
Like this? Want more?Subscribe to
Utne Reader
Page:
<< Previous 1 |
2 | 3 |