Reporters Under the Microscope
May-June 2008
by Staff, Utne Reader
For those of us who’ve been blinded by science—or blindsided by lousy reporting on technological and environmental issues—a new online tool helps identify the most spot-on sources. At the Observatory (CJR.org/the_observatory), launched in January by the intrepid media watchdogs at the Columbia Journalism Review, writers cast a skeptical glance at science journalism, scrutinizing everything from climate-change coverage to the heralding of pseudoscientific “trends.” In February, the site called out major media outlets, including CNN and the New York Times, for scientifically unsound reports on neuroimaging technology that could supposedly predict voters’ preferences. Don’t buy into this “neuropunditry,” the Observatory warned, using a term coined by Slate’s Daniel Engber, and beware of other election-season “techno infatuation.”
RELATED CONTENT
Patscan @ the University of British Columbia May 20, 2002 Issue By Julie Madsen Patscan @ the Univ...
By arming citizens journalists with webcams, a San Antonio TV station launches a new era in broadca...
Public journalism aims to give people a voice in media coverage...
The: Dan Wolf (1915-1996) [co-founder and original editor of The Village Voice]...
Pile Driver Investigative Journalism Uncovers Pro Wrestling Underbelly November 11, 2002 Issue By ...