Punk's Not Dead

Image Gallery Image by Flickr user: nic_r / Creative Commons

Punk-rock balladeer Billy Bragg first picked up the guitar after seeing The Clash perform live. But whereas hard core’s essential emotional range tends toward rage (Circle Jerks: “I’ve got the world up my ass!”) or hopelessness (X: “We’re desperate, get used to it!”), Bragg’s is expansive: bittersweet love songs, songs of exhaustion and misery, and, yes, songs of passionate anger at injustice. But even a raging Billy Bragg is somehow affirming. 

He’s also unashamedly ideological—a socialist, a trade unionist—and many of his songs sound as if they are intended to be sung on the picket line, which, in fact, they are. 

A new seven-CD box set of his music from Yep Roc Records serves up all of the above and includes remastered classic albums of the 1980s, as well as previously unreleased original songs and covers (a sweet cover of the Smiths “Back to the Old House” stands out). Also included are DVD clips of concert footage from Nicaragua, Lithuania, and East Berlin. It’s on stage that the music really comes alive; the studios tend to grind the burr off his playing. 

Bragg’s heyday may have been the Reagan/Thatcher years, but after 25 years of conservative government (from both parties, mind you), we find ourselves in desperate need of someone who will stand up on the broad cultural stage and voice our outrage, pain—and values. It’s what Billy Bragg did then. Here’s hoping he will do it again. 

Joseph Hart: Was it weird to go back and listen to stuff from 20 years ago? 

Billy Bragg: Not really, I wouldn’t say weird. I play these songs solo, so they still sound like they did on the first record. I’m still in touch with that vibe. Also, those first few records defined me politically. I often find myself in a context where I’m called upon to play some of those old political songs. It’s not easy being a leftist when you’ve got a Labour government. 

H: But at least the Labour Party professes to represent the values of the left, so you can hold them accountable. 

B: Well, tha’'s really one of the problems we have: the values of the left. How is that defined in the kind of postideological society that we live in? It’s one of the things that worries me. We’ve got so far away from the notions of what socialism could be, partly due to the end of the Cold War. I think we’re in danger of losing any form of principled ideas. The left just reacts to things as they turn up rather than having an overarching ideal for what society could be. It becomes a matter of pragmatism. 

H: We’re struggling with that in this country, trying to define the core values that we’re fighting for. 

B: It’s that chestnut argument, which unfortunately does have some weight to it: The antiglobalization movement is a positive thing, but what is it for? You want someone to come out and say, “Another world is possible.” And tell me what values that other world is based on. What is our alternative to globalization?