Obama’s Failing Emails

10/12/2011 11:34:09 AM

Tags: President Obama, Barack Obama, Keystone XL pipeline, environment, TomDispatch, Bill McKibben

bill-mckibben-utne-visionaryThis post originally appeared at TomDispatch.

***

For connoisseurs, Barack Obama’s fundraising emails for the 2012 election campaign seem just a tad forlorn -- slightly limp reminders of the last time ‘round.

Four years ago at this time, the early adopters among us were just starting to get used to the regular flow of email from the Obama campaign. The missives were actually exciting to get, because they seemed less like appeals for money than a chance to join a movement.

Sometimes they came with inspirational videos from Camp Obama, especially the volunteer training sessions staged by organizing guru Marshall Ganz. Here’s a favorite of mine, where a woman invokes Bobby Kennedy and Cesar Chavez and says that, as the weekend went on, she “felt her heart softening,” her cynicism “melting,” her determination building. I remember that feeling, and I remember clicking time and again to send another $50 off to fund that people-powered mission. (And I recall knocking on a lot of New Hampshire doors, too, with my 14-year-old daughter.)

It’s no wonder, then, that I’m still on the email list. But I haven’t been clicking through this time. Not even when Barack Obama himself asked me to “donate $75 or more today to be automatically entered for a chance to join me for dinner.” Not even when campaign manager Jim Messina pointed out that, though “the president has very little time to spend on anything related to the campaign… this is how he chooses to spend it -- having real, substantive conversations with people like you” over the dinner you might just win. (And if you do win, you’ll be put on a plane to “Washington, or Chicago, or wherever he might be that day.”)

Not even when deputy campaign manager Jen O’Malley Dillon offered to let me “take ownership of this campaign” by donating to it and, as an “added bonus,” possibly find myself “across the table from the president.” Not even when Michelle lowered the entry price from $75 to $25 and offered this bit of reassurance: “Just relax. Barack wants this dinner to be fun, and he really loves getting to know supporters like you.” Not even when, hours before an end-of-September fundraising “deadline,” Barack himself dropped the asking price to three dollars. God, have a little self-respect man!  Three dollars?

Here’s the thing I’m starting to think Obama never understood: yes, for most of us the 2008 campaign was partly about him, but it was more about the campaign itself -- about the sudden feeling of power that gripped a web-enabled populace, who felt themselves able to really, truly hope. Hope that maybe they’d found a candidate who would escape the tried-and-true money corruption of Washington.

None of us gave $50 hoping for a favor. Quite the opposite. You gave $50 hoping that, for the first time in a long while in American politics, no one would get a favor. And the candidate, it must be said, led us on. His rhetorical flights were dazzling -- to environmentalists like me, he promised to “free this nation from the tyranny of oil once and for all,” and pledged that his administration would mark the moment when “the rise of the oceans began to slow and our planet began to heal.”

Once in office, it was inevitable that he’d disappoint us to some degree.  In fact, we knew the disappointment would come and braced ourselves for it. After all, our movement was up against the staggering power of vested corporate and financial interests. It’s hard to beat big money. Still, we didn’t mind thinking: Yes, we can. We’ll work hard. We’ve got your back. Let’s go!

What we completely missed was that Obama didn’t want us at his back -- that the minute the campaign was over he would cut us adrift, jettison the movement that had brought him to power. Instead of using all those millions of people to force through ambitious health-care proposals or serious climate legislation or [fill in the blank yourself here], he governed as the opposite of a movement candidate.

He clearly had not the slightest interest in keeping that network activated and engaged. Though we had brought him to the party, it was as if he didn’t really want to dance with us. Instead -- however painful the image may be -- he wanted to dance with Larry Summers. (Fundraising idea: I’d pay $75 to be assured I never had to have dinner with Summers.)

As the months of his administration rolled into years, he only seemed to grow less interested in movements of any sort. Before long, people like Tom Donahue, president and CEO of the U.S. Chamber of Commerce, were topping the list of the most frequent visitors to the White House.  And that was before this winter when -- after they’d been the biggest contributors to GOP congressional candidates -- Obama went on bended knee to Chamber headquarters, apologizing that he hadn’t brought a fruitcake along as a gift. (What is it with this guy and food?  At any rate, he soon gave them a far better present, hiring former Chamber insider Bill Daley as his chief of staff.)

Now, his popularity tanking, Obama and his advisors talk about “tacking left” for the election. A nice thought, but maybe just a little late.

Increasingly, it seems to me, those of us who were ready to move with him four years ago are deciding to leave normal channels and find new forms of action. Here's an example: by year's end the president has said he will make a decision on the Keystone XL pipeline, which would carry crude oil from the tar sands of northern Alberta to the Gulf of Mexico. The nation's top climate scientists sent the administration a letter indicating that such a development would be disastrous for the climate.  NASA's James Hansen, the government's top climate researcher, said heavily tapping tar-sands oil, a particularly “dirty” form of fossil fuel, would mean “game over for the climate.” Ten of the president's fellow recent Nobel Peace Prize laureates pointed out in a letter that blocking the prospective pipeline would offer him a real leadership moment, a “tremendous opportunity to begin transition away from our dependence on oil, coal, and gas.”

But every indication from this administration suggests that it is prepared to grant the necessary permission for a project that has the enthusiastic backing of the Chamber of Commerce, and in which the Koch Brothers have a “direct and substantial interest.”  And not just backing.  To use the words of a recent New York Times story, they are willing to "flout the intent of federal law" to get it done.  Check this out as well: the State Department, at the recommendation of Keystone XL pipeline builder TransCanada, hired a second company to carry out the environmental review.  That company already considered itself a "major client" of TransCanada.  This is simply corrupt, potentially the biggest scandal of the Obama years.  And here's the thing: it's a crime still in progress.  Watching the president do nothing to stop it is endlessly depressing.

For many of us, it’s been an overdue wake-up call, a sharp reminder of just who the president was really listening to. In mid-summer, several leaders of the environmental movement, myself included, put out a call for nonviolent civil disobedience at the White House over the upcoming Keystone pipeline decision. And more people -- 1,253 in total -- showed up to be arrested than at anytime in the last 40 years. (One reason Obama’s emails stink this time around: the guy who used to write many of them, Elijah Zarlin, not only isn’t working for the campaign any more, but got hauled off in a paddy wagon.)

Bare months have past and already that arrest record is being threatened, thank heavens, by the forces of #OccupyWallStreet, a movement that includes plenty more of the kind of people who rallied so enthusiastically behind Obama back in 2008. 

Obama had mojo when he knew it wasn’t about him, that it was about change. But when you promise change, you have to deliver. His last best opportunity may come with that Keystone Pipeline decision, which he can make entirely by himself, without our inane Congress being able to get in the way. So on November 6th, exactly one year before the election, we’re planning to circle the White House with people. And the signs we’ll be carrying will simply be quotes from his last campaign -- all that stuff about the tyranny of big oil and the healing of the planet.

Our message will be simple: If you didn’t mean it, you shouldn’t have said it. If you did, here’s the chance to prove it.  Nix the pipeline.

We don’t want dinner. We want action.

Bill McKibben is an Utne Reader visionary, an organizer at tarsandsaction.org, a TomDispatch regular, and Schumann Distinguished Scholar at Middlebury College. His most recent book is Eaarth: Making a Life on a Tough New Planet. 

Copyright 2011 Bill McKibben

Source: TomDispatch 

Image credit: Illustration: Gluekit • McKibben photo: Nancie Battaglia 



Related Content

Viva Obama Artist Gets the Academic Treatment

Award-winning editorial cartoonist Lalo Alcaraz tells the story of his Viva Obama image...

How Spammers Make Money

How many unsuspecting rubes does it take to keep spammers in business?...

Peeing in Space: An Oral History of Space Tourism

Nowadays, if you’re lucky enough to have a spare $20 million dollars or so lying around, you can ind...

Google Develops Drunk-Message Prevention

Just when you thought Google couldn’t get any more useful (or pervasive), engineers at Google Labs h...

Content Tools
RSS




Post a comment below.

 

richard dye
10/30/2011 1:47:37 PM
I'm not an American....I'm not a democrat, I'm not a republican....for obvious reasons, I never will be. I'm at such a loss though, just as I was in 2008, when I hear things like Bill Mckibben has written here. I understand there was a nonsensical wave of enthusiasm...and psychology tells us just how powerful such social psychology is....but for the life of me! Bill, you seem like a thoughtful and honest man. Yet...how could you not know that Obama was getting funding from big corporations....wall street...big oil...big pharma....more than....well any candidate I remember? It was being reported, albeit, not prominently in your ultra-liberal media. He was so far into their pockets...he owed them big-time...and it has paid off for them. His functionally-useless spending has at least paid back many favors. Anyhow, I felt then, that you had voted in the most incompetent president of my lifetime...and I'm am sincerely saddened to be proven right. His foreign policy, economic policy, environmental policy....just about every aspect of his presidency has been horribly mismanaged....and above all that, he doesn't know how to get anything done politically...instead turning everything into posturing and grandstanding. We (and by that I mean the whole world) are paying the price. I'm sorry, but you, and everyone else who voted for him, were, and I know this sounds harsh, scammed. Period.

PE_5
10/18/2011 1:45:11 PM
Yes, the man's sad, yes, there's no-one better, but recall that you didn't vote for him alone, but (as his message hinted) YOU were the people you were waiting for. So what now? Occupy Wall St is your forum now—use it. The few dollars or euros you have are your daily votes to cast and withhold, far more than revocable formalities each 2 or 4 years. And all this, the Arab Spring, the European urban upheavals, the Occupiers, are a long 2011 prelude rising to a crescendo as a positive Shock galvanizes the world. Don’t wait and see, WORK and see! Take a new version of Pascal’s wager and bet on a better future—you have nothing to lose but More Of The Same!

wrldtrvlr
10/17/2011 11:03:33 AM
Sure Obama has been disappointing, but not near as disappointing as his competition. He has done a decent job considering the opposition, and he may be at last long learning to fight. Community organizers instill leadership in their communities so they own the changes that occur and are willing to fight for them. He did not seem to realize fully in the beginning that Americans need someone to blame for their own inaction. So go ahead and bite off your nose to spite your face, and end up with a Tea Party obstructionist. That's what you voted into the House and that appears what you will be getting more of.

Judith K_1
10/17/2011 8:59:48 AM
Yeah we get that Obama is a disgrace, maybe the lamest ass president ever, and he can't seriously expect to be re-elected. But who do we vote for instead? Mitt Romney? Or some other neo-fascist Republican? It would be nice if Obama would step aside and let a candidate with REAL integrity step up to the plate. Someone who's not bought and paid for. But who might that be? Does such a candidate exist? Could anybody run for president without buckets of Big Money? What's the solution?

Dreamed I Saw Joe Hill Last Night
10/17/2011 8:37:40 AM
Let's face it. Barack Obama was selling a bill of goods. He has made it absolutely clear that he is a progressive for electoral purposes only. I don't even read Obama emails. What a sad circumstance that having galvanized progressive voices, we the galvanized, find ourselves having elected a corporatist shill who hasn't the stomach to stand up to anyone other than those of us who voted for him.



Pay Now & Save $5!
First Name: *
Last Name: *
Address: *
City: *
State/Province: *
Zip/Postal Code:*
Country:
Email:*
(* indicates a required item)
Canadian subs: 1 year, (includes postage & GST). Foreign subs: 1 year, . U.S. funds.
Canadian Subscribers - Click Here
Non US and Canadian Subscribers - Click Here

Want to gain a fresh perspective? Read stories that matter? Feel optimistic about the future? It's all here! Utne Reader offers provocative writing from diverse perspectives, insightful analysis of art and media, down-to-earth news and in-depth coverage of eye-opening issues that affect your life.

Save Even More Money By Paying NOW!

Pay now with a credit card and take advantage of our earth-friendly automatic renewal savings plan. You save an additional $5 and get 4 issues of Utne Reader for only $31.00 (USA only).

Or Bill Me Later and pay just $36 for 4 issues of Utne Reader!