Web Specials Archives
Sam Daley-Harris IMAGINE
The hopelessness I carried was not unique to me. We all have our
own versions of it. And we must face the sluggish, sticky ugliness
of the hopelessness we carry around if we are to make any headway.
So start with Step 1: Get in touch with your commitment to serve,
your commitment to leave the campsite cleaner than you found it.
You might do this by remembering a time when you were moved by some
simple act of kindness, from one person to another or from one
person to many others. You might think about a time when you were
moved by one person's courage, perhaps a person of limited means or
limited power having the courage to take a stand.
RELATED CONTENT
The Year in Youth Activism September 25, 2002 Issue By Julie Madsen B ecause most media have occup...
Breast Cancer Activism Moving Beyond the Mammography Debate August 12, 2002 Issue By Julie Madsen ...
Prime Time Activism These days,TV sells sex, soap, and social change September October 1999 Issue ...
E-Book Activism: Saving the Arctic Refuge April 4, 2001 Leif Utne E-Book Activism: Saving ...
Outsourcing outreach takes a toll on the left's base...
Then go to Step 2: Face a problem that concerns you, preferably
something about which you could feel passionate-something that
lights you up. If nothing comes up at first, that's probably an
indication of deep resignation about addressing local, national, or
global problems. Don't worry, you are exactly where you should be.
Give it some time and thought.
That will immediately lead you to Step 3: Face the hopelessness
you feel about the problem. Maybe you were very active in the past
but have given up in some way. Your inaction or limited action on
the problem is probably a symptom of your hopelessness.
Step 4: Look for solutions. This step requires a little
research. What is the best thinking on the problem? What ideas or
interventions could make a real difference if people got behind
them?
Try this one on. UNICEF, the United Nations Children's Fund,
states that each day, 32,000 children die from largely preventable
malnutrition and disease. Yes, that's 32,000 children dying every
day and, yes, from largely preventable malnutrition and disease
(such as malnutrition coupled with measles or malnutrition coupled
with pneumonia). Thirty-two thousand children die each day. I know,
it's very hard to let something like this in. Recently, I had a
glimpse of what it might mean.
A few weeks before beginning this essay, Washington, D.C., the
city where I live, was hit by a snowstorm that was followed days
later by an ice storm. While carrying my 22-month-old son, Micah, I
stepped off the curb and slipped, and both of us fell to the icy
pavement. He was unhurt, but he could have suffered a severe, even
fatal, injury. In the days following that fall, every time that I
let myself consider the worst-case scenario, waves of grief swept
over me. I know that the 32,000 sets of parents who will lose their
children today feel a far deeper grief than I felt at just the
thought of losing my beautiful son.
What would it cost to save most of these lives? Maybe a few
cents' worth of measles vaccine, maybe a dollar's worth of
antibiotics. These figures make the following statement by retired
Oregon senator Mark Hatfield even more prophetic. Speaking in 1984,
at the height of the nuclear freeze movement, Senator Hatfield
said, 'We stand by as children starve by the millions because we
lack the will to eliminate hunger. Yet we have found the will to
develop missiles capable of flying over the polar cap and landing
within a few hundred feet of their target. This is not innovation.
It is a profound distortion of humanity's purpose on earth.'
Page:
<< Previous 1 | 2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
Next >>