C'mon Get Happy
(Page 2 of 2)
Web Specials Archives
Helen Cordes Utne Reader Online
What's driving this trend? Part of the appeal of pill-popping is
rooted in the increasingly popular view that mental illness is
biologically based, writes critics Seymour Fisher and Roger P.
Greenberg in Psychology Today (Sept./Oct. 1995). The two
veteran psych profs complain that some biological psychiatry fans
are so convinced that unhappiness results from physical
malfunctions of the brain that they're urging young shrinks to skip
psychotherapy training and learn 'scrip-writing instead.
RELATED CONTENT
Yet when the two authors examined the evidence, they found that
the bottom-line question -- do the drugs work? -- must often be
answered 'no.' Their overall research showed that overall,
one-third of patients did not improve with antidepressant
treatment; one-third improved with placebos, and one-third
responded favorably. The placebo research was revealing -- some
takers reported significant side-effects, even addiction, to the
inert sugar pills. This placebo effect along with the low efficacy
rates for drugs argues strongly against the biological basis for
mental illness.
So should drugs be avoided? Fisher and Greenberg say no, but
they do recommend avoiding antidepressant use at the first sign of
depressive distress. 'Depressed feelings have complex origins and
functions. In numerous contexts -- for example, chronic conflict
with a spouse -- depression may indicate a realistic appraisal of a
troubling problem and motivate a serious effort to devise a
solution,' they say. Quickly popping a pill 'could interfere with
the potentially constructive signaling value' of unhappy
feelings.
Page:
<< Previous 1 | 2 |