Web Specials Archives
The Editors Utne Reader
We asked some of America's leading authors and healers 'Do healers
really heal?' and 'How does healing occur?' We received every
possible response: yes, no, yes and no, maybe... Here, edited for
brevity, is a sampling of their replies.
RELATED ARTICLES
Is your life like this, too?...
How a walk in the woods might lead to a medical breakthrough...
Good Vibrations New treatments tackle arthritis, allergies, and other ailments by tapping our bodi...
Jeanne Achterberg, Ph.D., is professor of psychology at
Saybrook Institute in San Francisco, senior editor of
Alternative Therapies in Health & Medicine, and the
author of Imagery in Healing and Rituals of Healing.
I can't answer the question 'Do healers really heal' directly
because it depends, first of all, on how the word healer is being
defined, and what it is healers are healing people of or from. My
personal definition is that healers are those who have chosen a
vocation of helping others recover from 'disease' in some capacity.
And I believe disease is a rupture in life's harmony -- whether it
be in matters typically identified as physical, mental, or
spiritual. Other than that, healers, healing, and what is
classified as disease have so much cultural variation that there
simply cannot be an easy, unqualified answer to your questions. We
must remember that there is no universal manifestation, diagnosis,
or treatment of any disease -- particularly those that involve the
deepest, most difficult matters of the soul.
However, I do not believe, under any circumstances, that healers
(however they are defined) can induce cliff-hanging, long-lasting,
important cures. People heal themselves. Healers can only gently
facilitate the process with their wisdom, therapy, and presence.
Now, with that said, individuals who are sanctioned within their
cultures as healers are able to help others (with a higher degree
of regularity than nonhealers) with the diseases that are peculiar
(or at least idiosyncratically labeled) within the cultural milieu.
Otherwise, they are not trusted by the community, their ways of
healing die out, and the paradigm shifts. Human beings are
empiricists who may be occasionally misguided in their choices of
healers and healing practices, but not for long. With rare
exceptions, it seems that healers of a particular ilk may only be
able to help others who share a common belief system and
worldview.
I have no 'hard' data to support my opinion -- only
anthropological lore and my years of research and clinical
observation. But true, remarkable healing seems to be a function of
restoring or reweaving the torn fabric of life in some way. The
healee is brought back into a resonant harmony with the community,
the planet, and his or her relationships in the broadest fashion
imaginable. Rituals appropriate to the situation -- pills, potions,
chants, surgery, or whatever -- seem to be only the visible,
technical, and highly variant aspects of healing. The vital factors
in the healing process, however, transcend all of these and include
intention, motivation, trust, and something as ineffable as passion
for living. When suffering and tragedy are transformed and colored
with meaning and purpose, healing has surely occurred, by whatever
means and under whatever circumstances.
Page: 1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
Next >>