Four Ideas for Reforming Corporate Governance Post-Enron
Web Specials Archives
Marjorie Kelly Business Ethics magazine
The picture on the front page of the New York Times in early May
was memorable: five Enron directors with hands upraised, swearing
to a Senate subcommittee they were not responsible for the
company's collapse. Pathetic as they seemed, they were telling the
truth. Corporate directors are not in any real sense 'directing'
companies. And that's the problem.
RELATED CONTENT
Millennium 'Manifesto' Calls for Shift Toward Global Governance Web Specials Archives Mieke B...
An eco-friendly electric car called the Kenguru is specifically designed for wheelchair users....
There’s a dark side to the recent trend in corporate repsonsiblity: It is giving conscientious inve...
George Kalamaras' The Theory and Function of Mangoes...
In a telling moment before the subcommittee, the directors
confessed they 'had no inkling that Enron was in troubled waters
until mid-October 2001' right before the house of cards collapsed.
This may seem unconscionable negligence, but it is more
fundamentally a result of the design of corporate governance.
Boards of directors don't govern because all essential governance
happens before the board meets. State law mandates directors must
act in the best interests of the corporation and its shareholders,
which courts interpret to mean maximum share price. So as long as
share price remains high, directors feel confident. Yet it was
precisely the hyper-inflation of share price that destroyed
Enron.
Post-Enron, it's clear that pursuit of profits must stay within
ethical bounds, and that executives and shareholders may not enrich
themselves by extorting the public or employees. Toothless codes of
ethics like Enron's are no help. Ethical concerns must grow teeth
which means biting into reform of corporate governance. While most
proposals for reform today merely tinker at the margins, some get
to the heart of the matter. Below are four of the best.
1. Ensure auditors really audit by making them fully
independent. Instead of having companies be the 'bosses' of their
own auditors selecting and paying the firms they want to work with
a Corporate Accountability Commission could assign auditors and pay
them from fees assessed on companies. That's the proposal of Ralph
Estes, emeritus professor of accounting at American University, in
his proposed Corporate Accountability Act
(www.stakeholderalliance.org/CorpAccAct.html).
The commission would be empowered to expand reporting requirements
beyond stockholder needs to encompass data needed by other
stakeholders such as pollution emissions, wages and benefits paid,
and corporate welfare received.
Page: 1 |
2 |
3 |
Next >>