The Enigma of Kerala
(Page 2 of 10)
Web Specials Archives
Bill McKibben
It is, in other words, weird--like one of those places where the
starship Enterprise might land that superficially resembles
Earth but is slightly off. It undercuts maxims about the world we
consider almost intuitive: Rich people are healthier, rich people
live longer, rich people have more opportunity for education, rich
people have fewer children. We know all these things to be
true--and yet here is a countercase, a demographic Himalaya
suddenly rising on our mental atlas. It's as if someone
demonstrated in a lab that flame didn't necessarily need oxygen, or
that water could freeze at 60 degrees. It demands a new chemistry
to explain it, a whole new science.
RELATED CONTENT
Christians, Hindus, and Sikhs in the West are saving money and trouble by sending their worship nee...
Kerala emerged at the end of the eighth century, when a Hindu
monarchy supplanted a looser, feudal structure. The trade contacts
of the ancient and early medieval periods--Kerala's cardamom,
pepper, turmeric, and other spices were constant attractions (our
word ginger derives from a word in the local language,
Malayalam)--eventually turned to more modern, and more
exploitative, colonial domination. By 1792, the British controlled
what is now Kerala, dividing it into three districts. The first
hints of singularity came in that colonial era. In the southern
two-thirds of the state, the British left the local princes on the
throne. Hoping for an agricultural surplus large enough to satisfy
both themselves and the British, these rajahs offered tax breaks
for the reclamation of swamps and marshes, and they moved to give
tenant farmers more control over the land. 'Development policy in
the whole world is generally considered to begin in the 1940s,'
says historian Michael Tharakan. 'But you can see the roots of it
right from the beginning of the 19th century in Kerala.' To
conclude, however, that Kerala under the British was becoming an
enlightened and democratic place would be a mistake. The tradition
of caste, bulwark of the Hindu rulers since the eighth century, was
as strong as ever in the nineteenth. At the top of the heap were
the Namboodiri Brahmins, followed by the Nairs--soldiers and
administrators--and various artisanal classes. Below all of them
were the Ezhavas, roughly a fifth of the population, who
traditionally made their living climbing palms to harvest the
coconuts, and the Pulayas, the local untouchables. Within the
various castes, innumerable complicated subsets emerged, and the
codes of conduct became ever stricter and more degrading over
time.
Kerala is now less caste-ridden than any spot in the Hindu
world; it is a transition more complete than, say, the
transformation achieved by the civil rights movement in the
American South. Looking backward, it is clear that some of this
epic, and mostly peaceful, change can be traced to new economic
conditions. As the British and the rajahs pushed cash crops instead
of subsistence farming, and as more and more tenant farmers became
involved with that market, the need for literacy, for instance,
grew, and some of the old customs became financially ruinous.
Page:
<< Previous 1 | 2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
10 |
Next >>