Web Specials Archives
Ed Ayres
In 1962, when Rachel Carson published
RELATED CONTENT
Hey, all you guilt-stricken liberals. Let the water run. Throw those recyclable milk jugs in the tr...
On many sustainable farms, animals are an essential part of the equation...
2000 Finalists: Science and Environment...
Nominees for Science and the Environment...
Science and Environment 2001 November/December 2001 Utne Reader Alternative Therapies www.alternati...
Silent Spring, the
book that first raised the alarm about widespread toxic chemicals
in our water, she unwittingly launched the American environmental
movement on a dangerous course. There is no way she could have
known what would happen, but people didn't like to be told that
their country was threatened from within. Americans had won World
War II, repelling a terrible threat from abroad, and were keeping
the Soviets at bay. They liked the new industrial economy that was
bringing rising affluence, suburbs, and cars, and many didn't like
to hear it disparaged.
The chemical industry took quick advantage, vilifying Carson. A
pattern was established, one that would increasingly brand those
who issued environmental warnings as troublemakers or
spoilsports--or as anti-American. Even as environmental decline
accelerated, the industries whose products were contributing most
heavily to the decline were booming, enriching their managers and
shareholders.
So it was that American kids of the late 20th century, taught by a
generation that had enjoyed unprecedented income growth and
material wealth, never got a chance to learn an essential truth
about life: that the environment is not just a world of remote rain
forests or endangered species unrelated to their interests in the
latest music or clothes, but rather is the basis of all the
material well-being with which they were growing up. In high
school, very few got to learn that the hydrological cycle and
carbon cycle are global processes without which there could be no
soccer, sex, or rock and roll . . . or great books, friendships, or
plans. A survey taken at the end of the century found that the
average American could identify more than 1,000 corporate logos or
brands, but knew only 10 species of plants. Kids grew up in the
1980s and 90s far more knowledgeable about products than about
life.
During those years, leading scientists tried to get the public's
attention, but their message--that something had gone dangerously
wrong with the American dream--went unheard. Like Rachel Carson
before them, they grew increasingly concerned about what they
perceived to be a massive denial.
In 1992, a gathering of 1,670 of the world's most accomplished
scientists issued an extraordinary document, the
World
Scientists' Warning to Humanity. It summarized the ways in
which the fast-growing human population and its expanding
industries are destabilizing the Earth's life systems, and it
concluded, 'Human beings and the natural world are on a collision
course.' The warning was signed by 104 Nobel Prize winners in the
sciences--a majority of all those living. Yet most Americans never
heard about it.
Three years later, climate scientists from around the globe issued
a warning that greenhouse gases generated by the growing number of
cars, furnaces, forest fires, and coal-fired power plants appeared
to be causing a rise in the Earth's temperature that could act like
a planetary fever--melting polar ice, bringing more frequent and
more destructive weather disasters, precipitating massive flooding
of coastal cities, causing crop-killing droughts, and disrupting
ecosystems everywhere. These warnings, too, were vilified by
business and political leaders and largely ignored by the media,
which, by then, were not only caught up in the economic euphoria of
the time but were financially dependent on the commercial
advertising of the very industries whose products the scientists
implicated in global climate change.
Page: 1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
Next >>