The Primordial Schmooze
Was gossip the evolutionary spark for human speech?
Web Specials Archives
Miles Harvey Utne Reader
Gossip, according to a couple of recent studies, accounts for about
two-thirds of all our conversation. Human beings, it seems, are
natural-born busybodies. But this is not necessarily a bad thing.
In fact, argues the author of a controversial new book, our
ingrained propensity to stick our noses into other people's
business is what may have given humans our greatest evolutionary
gift: language.
RELATED ARTICLES
Wabi-sabi restores a measure of sanity to modern living....
The Virtuous Male Web Specials Archives Keith Thompson Utne Reader Online More than a decade...
Our favorite new books, music & more...
The Kama Sutra is justly famed as the most ancient and greatest of treatises on the art of love--bu...
In Grooming, Gossip and the Evolution of Language
(Harvard University Press, 1997), Robin Dunbar, an anthropologist
at the University of Liverpool and an authority on gelada baboons,
argues that gossip is not a paltry by-product of language but
rather its raison d'?tre. 'The conventional view,' writes Dunbar, '
is that language evolved to enable males to do things like
coordinate hunts more effectively... An alternative view might be
that language evolved to enable the exchange of highfalutin'
stories about the supernatural or the tribe's origins. The
hypothesis I am proposing is diametrically opposed to ideas like
these, which formally or informally have dominated everyone's
thinking in disciplines from anthropology to linguistics and
paleontology. In a nutshell, I am suggesting that language evolved
to allow us to gossip.'
Dunbar is hardly the first person who claims to have discovered
the genesis of speech, one of science's enduring puzzles.
'Airy-fairy speculations on the origins of language have been
trotted out for hundreds of years, pinpointing everything from
parrots to menstrual rituals as the precursor to chatter,' writes
Daniel Zalewski in Lingua Franca (March 1997). Nonetheless,
Dunbar's theory -- despite its outwardly outrageous premise -- is
receiving serious attention from the scientific community.
The hypothesis suggests that language evolved among our hominid
ancestors as a 'cheap and ultra-efficient form of grooming' -- the
widespread practice among primates of picking through a companion's
fur to remove loose skin and burrs. As Dunbar points out, for many
primates grooming is not simply a matter of hygiene; it is an
expression of friendship and loyalty, a means of communication.
Indeed, grooming is ' the key to the processes that give primate
societies their cohesion and sense of belonging,' he writes. So
important is this 'wordless pageant' that it fills up to 20 percent
of the waking hours of some species.