Turning to One Another
(Page 3 of 5)
Web Specials Archives
Margaret Wheatley and Myron Kellner-Rogers Kellner-Rogers Utne Reader
When Complex Systems Fail
RELATED CONTENT
Gardeners are tuned in to the weather; we can’t help it. We grumble over droughts and fret about wh...
Greed has long driven looters to rip Native American artifacts from the ground and sell them on the...
The best story in a book sometimes turns up in the inscription...
Journalism is turning our stories into industrial waste...
--Engage the whole system. Frequently ask, 'Who else should be
involved?'
--Create abundant information, circulate it through existing and
new channels.
--Develop quality relationships; trust is the greatest asset.
--Support only collaboration; competition destroys capacity.
--Forget boundaries and territories; push for openness
everywhere.
--Focus on creating new, sustainable systems. There is no going
back.
Because of its complex nature, Y2K demands that we transform the
ways we work together, that we forego traditional boundaries and
competitive behaviors, that we let go of past conflicts and
injuries. We must turn to one another to solve the unsolvable, we
must depend on one another to find solutions. We simply cannot get
through whatever disruptions or breakdowns occur by remaining
isolated or indifferent.
How we come together now will give us the capacity to face the
unknown of the year 2000. We don't have to know the future in order
to be prepared for it. Organizations and communities that learn to
work together, that trust one another, and that become more
expansive and inclusive develop the capacity to deal with whatever
happens. They have created a capacity for working and thinking
together that enables them to respond quickly and intelligently to
surprise and distress.
This paradoxical truth was well illustrated a few years ago when
major chemical plants in West Virginia engaged with the community
to develop worst-case scenarios. Living with 14 large chemical
manufacturing facilities, the citizens around Charleston exercised
their EPA-mandated right to know how a failure in any one of these
plants could affect their lives. What would be the worst that could
happen to them, given the worst conditions and the worst
dysfunctions? (For one plant, a leak from their anhydrous ammonia
storage tank during high winds would create a deadly plume that
would destroy all life within 30 miles.)
Early in the process the plant managers took an enormous risk
and decided to involve the community in developing the necessary
information. Every committee was chaired by a member of the
community. Together with plant personnel, they gathered information
about the deadliest events that could occur. When they were ready
to present their scenarios--28 scenes of terror and
destruction--they set up booths in a popular shopping mall on a
Saturday. (This choice of venue was suggested by a woman in the
community.) As summarized by Dick Knowles, then plant manager of
the Belle DuPont facility, 'We presented 28 ways we could kill the
community, and trust went up.'
Page:
<< Previous 1 |
2 | 3 |
4 |
5 |
Next >>