Turning to One Another
(Page 4 of 5)
Web Specials Archives
Margaret Wheatley and Myron Kellner-Rogers Kellner-Rogers Utne Reader
This is a familiar lesson from participative processes. As
people engage with one another--even as they develop terrorizing
information--they develop relationships that enable them to
encounter the unknown together, and they develop much greater
collective intelligence. Old divisions and problems fade in
importance; people learn that in working together they are capable
of achieving surprising results that benefit everybody. And people
develop trust in themselves as a coherent collective. They have
learned to think well together, and they have made decisions that
they're proud of. They have realized that they hold in common
enough concerns and desires so they can work well, even
brilliantly, together.
RELATED CONTENT
New vaccines may take the fun out of drugs. Should we inoculate kids to prevent partying?...
Is Rush Limbaugh Right? Not quite. Republicans may be on top, but that doesn't mean the rest of us...
My retirement plan is to be found stiff and cold at my writing desk....
Greed has long driven looters to rip Native American artifacts from the ground and sell them on the...
The year 2000 problem requires just such participation from all
of us. We cannot leave Y2K to the technology experts, or to the
consultants, or to leaders. We are all affected, we all have
essential perspectives to contribute, and we all must be
involved.
What's Possible and Who Cares?
In the past few years, more and more people have expressed a
great longing for community and autonomy. Can we use Y2K to
transform these longings into new ways of being together? The year
2000 requires that communities, regions, nations, and the planetary
community work together to develop scenarios and make contingency
plans. But it is how we choose to engage in that planning that
offers the real opportunity for deep and meaningful change. Let's
all begin our planning from the place of possibility, not fear.
Consultants from the University of Washington's program on
sustainable community have learned that the first critical question
to ask of any community is: 'What's worth sustaining?' If we can
begin Y2K planning from this essential question, we will evoke our
best creative energies. Years ago, consultant and organizer Marvin
Weisbord learned that he had been asking the wrong question. He had
gone into troubled systems asking 'What's wrong and how can I fix
it?' He came to understand that the critical question was, 'What's
possible, and who cares?'
If we begin our planning from 'What's possible?' we will avoid
attempts to patch together the old system, or to frantically
re-create systems that have resulted in isolation and
dissatisfaction. People do want to be together differently. In a
recent survey on Y2K, 89 percent of respondents wanted simpler,
more decentralized systems so that their communities could be more
self-reliant and independent.
The nature and complexity of Y2K leads us to invite back those
we've excluded from current society. Our elders knew how to
function before computers became substitutes for human activity.
Our poor and disenfranchised long ago learned how to pull together
in the face of need, or failed delivery of services. Our youth want
to reconnect with us, their energy could be focused on the many
assessment and information-gathering activities required. Our
churches can provide both physical and emotional centers for this
work.
Page:
<< Previous 1 |
2 |
3 | 4 |
5 |
Next >>