|
|

Monday, November 26, 2012 4:02 PM
by Solutions Online
Kalle Lasn is the co-founder of the Adbusters Media Foundation, editor-in-chief of Adbusters magazine, and author of the books Culture Jam and Design Anarchy. Lasn was recognized as an Utne Reader visionary in 2001 for his efforts to reclaim Western culture from the influence of corporations, consumption, and advertising.
This article originally appeared at
Solutions Online and is licensed under Creative Commons.
Founder and editor of Adbusters magazine, Kalle Lasn is largely credited for conceptualizing and starting the Occupy Wall Street protests in Zuccotti Park, New York, which eventually spread around the world. His new book, Meme Wars, aims to reinvent the study of economics. Here, he talks to Solutions about his vision for the future.
You have been trying to change consumer culture for years. How did the idea for Occupy Wall Street begin?
It began in early 2011. It was percolating in 2010. We were excited by the anarchist action in Greece and discontent among young people in Spain, and the Arab Spring began in Tunisia and spread to Egypt, and we saw how young people in Egypt were using social media to get tons of people out to the streets and pull off regime change. Our brainstorming sessions at Adbusters began and we said, “We need a regime change in America as well.” Not hard regime change like Egypt where dictators were torturing people. We are after a soft regime change. We felt the heart of American democracy and found that, in Washington, DC, things were rotten and corporations were getting their own way with lobbyists and money power. Wall Street people have created a global casino, and meanwhile young people are having a hard time finding jobs and are losing their houses. So let’s try to create a Tahrir Square moment in America.
How do you feel about how the protests ended? Did they flame out, or was it a success? What lessons were learned?
It was a huge success. A lot of people say, “They never came up with demands.” But here is a movement of young people who felt their future didn’t compute, and they fought it in a horizontal, leaderless way, and they launched a national conversation in America and in Canada, and last October the conversation went international. So a few hundred people in Zuccotti Park launched a huge international debate about the future and that’s as good as it comes.
Now, we know it’s winding down, and there’s a big question mark: can we keep this going, and morph into new strategies, and still command attention with the world? And I believe we can. This movement has long legs and a core impulse—this feeling among hundreds of millions of young people that their lives will be full of ecological and political and financial crises, and they can’t aspire to the lives their parents had, unless they stand up and fight for a different future. I don’t think anything can stop these young people and I predict we’re going to move away from large occupations of parks and we’ll have surprise, one-day occupations of banks and corporations and the economics departments of universities, with more and more people talking about the Robin Hood tax and high frequency trading and bank reform and campaign finance reform. These surprise, one-day occupations will start popping up in cities everywhere. This movement will fragment into a million projects.
What are members of the movement talking about now?
[...] Back in 2008, when the financial meltdown happened and caught all the classical economists by surprise, there were a lot of bioeconomists and ecological economists waiting in the wings, hungry to shift that paradigm. And there will be a revolt of students against their professors. And we may find ourselves next year with hundreds of students occupying the economics departments of their universities. It wouldn’t just be a policy shift like taxing the rich. It would be a shift in the fundamental axioms of economic science and a tinkering with the bedrock of our economic system. The next generation of economists would have a totally different worldview.
What should the new economic outlook be?
Ecological economists and the movement started by Herman Daly and others. There are already ecological associations and a journal. The natural world is the main part of this ecological paradigm and the money economists are just a subset. It would be a reversal of roles. It could give birth to a generation of barefoot economists with their feet firmly in the real world.
Herman Daly and Robert Costanza, both founders of ecological economics, are on the Solutions editorial board. Robert Costanza is our editor in chief.
I hope you tell them that from my perspective their ideas are reaching fruition, and I wish they would encourage their followers to be more aggressive. Suddenly, old and young people are pushing against the system and it’s time for ecological economists to stand up and be counted and not just play academic games in the background. Joseph Stiglitz actually went to Zuccotti Park and gave a talk. We need more of that. We need them to champion their paradigm.
We also don’t have full cost accounting. There is a dream among Occupiers to have a global market where products show their ecological cost, which would reflect their true cost. They will find that the price of cars goes up and bikes goes down. Maybe that McDonald’s napkin could suddenly have a certain price to it. And apples from New Zealand would have a different price. How much does all that stuff from China going to Walmart truly cost in environmental damage?
Given that populist anger had brewed for years among America’s middle and lower classes, why didn’t this sort of activism start earlier?
The moment wasn’t right. Something heaved back in 2008, when the meltdown happened. Something heaved again when the young people of Tunisia and Egypt stood up. This feeling that the young people have in the pit of their stomachs doesn’t compute. This is really sinking in with a vengeance now. If the global economy keeps tanking, we may be in for some version of the 1929 scenario, and a lot of these projects and paradigm shifts, and the dismantling of the global casinos, and Robin Hood taxes, and the radical transformation of businesses—they may well need that kind of crisis to be implemented.
Imagine that the Occupy movement achieves everything you think it can. What does the world look like after this ultimate success? How long will it take to get there?
It’s all about producing a different type of human being. Like the Occupiers who slept in the park. Their cynicism dissolved and they were engaged and they merged into this different kind of human being. They were alive and alert and energized and this is what it’s about. This movement will be a success if it can produce a new generation of young people who are fighting a good fight and can do what needs to be done. It’s going to take an eternity because the human project never ends. We are at a tipping point right now. This feels like one of the biggest tipping points. We have never faced the possibility of ecological and physical and political crises all swirling around each other and ready to swoop down on us and create a nightfall. Not just a 1929 scenario, but a 50- to 100- or 1,000-year blockade. It’s totally in the cards. I hope this Occupy movement will give impetus to young people and make them fight harder to avoid the pitfalls of humanity.
Image: Banksy Balloon Girl by Stew Dean, licensed under Creative Commons.
Monday, October 01, 2012 9:37 AM
by Kalle Lasn
Kalle Lasn is the co-founder of the Adbusters Media Foundation, editor-in-chief of Adbusters magazine, and author of the books Culture Jam and Design Anarchy. Lasn was recognized as an Utne Reader visionary in 2001 for his efforts to reclaim Western culture from the influence of corporations, consumption, and advertising.
This article originally appeared in Adbusters.
So you’re sitting in the coffee shop sipping your latte and staring at your iPad and you think you know what’s going on eh?
You flip through some images and read the latest news about some
disgruntled guys in some far away place who are wearing face coverings
and brandishing AK-47s and RPGs. They are the enemies, the story says.
Luckily you’re reading some “liberal” journalism so you’re getting some
good in-depth analysis and not just a knee-jerk disregard of whatever
these people stand for. They’ve got a few legitimate grievances you
find, but mostly they’re fanatics.
So now you’re informed about some of those pockets of ultra-Islamist
barbarism springing up in parts of the world. You think you might have
even connected some of the dots on your own about why this phenomenon is
happening. Then you scroll down some more and it gets all fucked up
again.
You check out those crazy people in Nigeria who call themselves Boko
Haram. They want a complete overthrow of Western cultural and economic
values (Boko Haram literally means “Western education is sinful”) and
they are so fanatical about their cause that they vow to kill anybody
who criticizes them.
How is this possible? Even your liberal arts degree knows you can’t
excuse this type of cultural relativism. Our governments, our NGOs, our
peacekeepers, our business leaders are enlightened, right, building
schools for these peoples girls and handing out candy and toothbrushes
to their shoeless kids? You tap your finger on the screen which starts a
video where one of these Boko Haram guys says “democracy is not a
decree of God” and “I rejoice in the killing the way I rejoice in
cutting chicken.”
What the hell is with these people? Where does their terrifyingly
dystopic logic come from? What is it they want and why do they think
they can get it by bombing government buildings, public squares and even
churches? We in the West are wiser now from our failed soirées into
Vietnam, Afghanistan and Iraq. We’ve learned to not sow the seeds of
this kind of blowback. Right?
So now you’re left with only one conclusion: “My god they must be
bloodthirsty barbarians, evil creatures who need to be droned into
submission.” But something in you is still not satisfied. And each time
you probe a little deeper you realize that there are billions of people
out there living in a dog-eats-dog state of poverty that we in the West
would find inhuman and unimaginable … you understand that we have no
idea about what it takes to maintain some modicum of social cohesion in
these desperate places … and when you delve a tad deeper you may even
start to think that these rebels may actually be at the cutting edge of a
multi-faceted global revolt against Western-style capitalism: usury,
petrol-states, Lady Gaga, Coca Cola, the IMF, World Bank, that whole
decadent, self-serving kaboodle …
Then you click to a mini documentary which shows an African man who
hasn’t eaten for days carrying his half dead goat to market in a last
desperate attempt to buy some food for his starving family … to sell off
the last remaining goat that this year’s drought has not killed yet …
there he sits, on the screen of your tablet, in the hot sun all
afternoon and nobody wants to buy his goat because who wants to buy an
emaciated dying goat?
Suddenly you realize the same world that lets a man starve to death
in some no-name place clutching a shitty old goat is the same world that
sells Hummers and air conditioners and $1000 stilettos and Super Big
Gulps less than 24 hours away in any direction from that very same dying
man; the same world that at this very moment offers you travel deals on
the corner of your screen because Google knows based on how long you’ve
been lingering on this page that you are interested in Africa and maybe
want to go there.
You take your hands off the tablet and warm your cold fingertips
against the cardboard to-go cup of your latte. You get a bit angry at
the injustice. You get a bit shameful. You go back to scrolling again …
There is horrific pain, suffering and death happening right now in
Nigeria, Niger, Burkina Faso and across Africa and the Middle East and
other parts of the world. You might think that for us in the West things
look bleak: you may lose your job and your house, tuition might go up
and you may not be able to afford your morning lattes much longer, but
in places like Northern Nigeria, climate change induced drought –
largely caused by us in the West – is decimating people by the millions …
And you know it is only going to get worse.
If you’re living, like that guy with his goat, in a world where death
is always lurking just around the corner, then maybe it isn’t so
inconceivable that it would one day dawn on you that you too may want to
join Boko Haram?
If so, God save us all …
Images: (top) "Latte" by fir0002/Flagstaffotos, GNU Free Dcumentation License; (bottom) "Woman at Occupy Wall Street, Liberty Square, New York" by Timothy Krause, licensed under Creative Commons.
Friday, December 12, 2008 11:36 AM
The Adbusters-promoted National Buy Nothing Day (a.k.a. Black Friday) has gained steam over the past few years, but what about an entire buy-nothing Christmas? The anti-consumerism magazine wants to help. In the latest issue, writer Gary Gach ruminates on "What Would the Buddha Buy?"—the first in a series of articles to help identify and avoid the “moment during which real pleasure becomes abstract desire—the want to want.”
Easier said than done, of course, which is why Gach also advocates mindful purchases and donations in place of buying for buying’s sake. Instead of obsessing over finding perfect gifts for your loved ones, make spending time with them a priority. Instead of purchasing a new gadget or sweater, donate what you already have but don’t use; the strategy has the double benefit of helping those in need and clearing up space. “It’s harder to be grasping greedily when your arms are extended in giving,” Gach writes.
Image by mermay19, licensed under Creative Commons.
Tuesday, August 12, 2008 1:31 PM
That culturally ubiquitous slice of youth culture known as hipsters now finds itself under the microscope of the always provocative Adbusters. The magazine’s latest issue—and, to some extent, its overall editorial mission—is predicated on the alleged cultural malaise of the past 50 years, beginning with the rise of postwar consumer culture as an inevitable byproduct of Western ingenuity. “Practical cleverness beats the crap out of spiritual wisdom on the battlefield and in the marketplace, as the West has made clear over the last 500 years,” the preface declares. “But cleverness without wisdom sooner or later destroys life.”
Douglas Haddow’s lead essay, "Hipster: The Dead End of Western Civilization," takes it from there, positing hipsters as avatars of the narcissism and spiritual emptiness Adbusters laments, and as the probable harbingers of civilization’s decline. “We’ve reached a point in our civilization where counterculture has mutated into a self-obsessed aesthetic vacuum," Haddow writes. "So while hipsterdom is the end product of all prior countercultures, it’s been stripped of its subversion and originality, and is leaving a generation pointlessly obsessing over fashion, faux individuality, cultural capital and the commodities of style.”
As much as the cantankerous square in me wants to see hedonistic youngsters taken down a peg, I think this essay might be giving hipsters a bit too much credit, overestimating both their cultural impact and longevity while longing nostalgically for a chimeral sense of past “cool” whose own authenticity is itself suspect. “An amalgamation of its own history, the youth of the West are left with consuming cool rather than creating it,” Haddow claims. But is this sort of inversion really so unprecedented? Are hipsters the first generation to practice it? And isn’t it more accurate to say that all youth everywhere, not just hipsters, end up doing both the creating and the consuming of culture, with the advertising and entertainment industries serving as mediators?
Yes, the commodification of cool is obnoxious, but it’s not novel and it’s not an agent of the apocalypse. Casting oneself and one’s peers as the “last generation, a culmination of all previous things”—as Haddow does, in his essay’s dour conclusion—displays the same narcissism and myopia as the culture he’s skewering. Hipsters are really nothing more than the latest manifestation of the disaffected, nihilistic youth population that mutates into a new form with each generation. They’re an obnoxious but essentially innocuous pocket of youth culture whose era is already waning, especially now that hipsterdom has been thoroughly assimilated into mainstream culture, branded, and codified into a household word. The hipster fad is now so ubiquitous as to be almost meaningless: everyone and no one is a hipster.
Besides, I’m immediately suspicious of any author who posits the “end” of anything. Hipsters represent the end of Western civilization? Really? Alarmist generalizations are guaranteed to sell magazines and generate angry emails to the editor—in fact, the inevitable debate will probably be more interesting than the article that inspired it. But ultimately, I suspect hipsters are simply kids in a phase they’ll eventually grow out of, just like the Gen-Xers, punks, hippies, beatniks, and flappers before them.
Image by Joseph Mohan.
 |
Want to gain a fresh perspective? Read stories that matter? Feel optimistic about the future? It's all here! Utne Reader offers provocative writing from diverse perspectives, insightful analysis of art and media, down-to-earth news and in-depth coverage of eye-opening issues that affect your life.
Save Even More Money By Paying NOW!
Pay now with a credit card and take advantage of our earth-friendly automatic renewal savings plan. You save an additional $6 and get 6 issues of Utne Reader for only $29.95 (USA only).
Or Bill Me Later and pay just $36 for 6 issues of Utne Reader!

|
|