Add to My MSN

The Loving Story

2/17/2012 10:54:19 AM

Tags: Loving v. Virginia, Defense of Marriage Act, racism, discrimination, gay marriage, politics, Humanities, Danielle Magnuson

Mildred and Richard Loving

Check out the January/February 2012 issue of Humanities magazine for a terrific article about the historic U.S. Supreme Court case that gave interracial couples the legal right to marry in the United States. At the heart of the case is a couple, Richard and Mildred Loving, whose uncompromising love survived despite a hostile environment, multiple arrests for living together as husband and wife, and an eventual 25-year banishment decree from their home state of Virginia. According to Humanities:

The Lovings had broken the state’s 1924 Racial Integrity Act, a law that went to nearly insane lengths to keep anyone with even one drop of black blood from mixing with a white person.

It’s hard not to notice the striking similarity between the Racial Integrity Act, struck down by Loving v. Virginia in 1967, and the Defense of Marriage Act. Both rely on morally weighted language (“integrity” and “defense”), trying to disguise what the laws really are: one racist and one homophobic, both profoundly discriminatory.

Another detail that bears mentioning as the world discusses whether or not loving couples should have the legal right to marry: The Lovings were not exactly activists looking to rattle the nation, just everyday people trying to go about their everyday life:

Richard Loving refused to attend the Supreme Court hearing—he was a private man, averse to publicity. He was not a rabble-rouser, nor was his wife, who opted to stay behind with him awaiting the verdict that would transform their life—one way or the other. But Richard, the man of few words, did have something he wanted his lawyer to convey to the nine justices deciding his fate: “Tell the court I love my wife.”

Note: See the new HBO documentary, The Loving Story, about the Loving v. Virginia case.

Source: Humanities 

Image by Grey Villet, Courtesy HBO.

Danielle Magnuson is an associate editor at Utne Reader. Follow her on Twitter @DnlMag.



Related Content

U.S. Immigration Courts Illegally Kept Secret

Immigration hearings, federally mandated to be open to the public, are illegally kept secret by immi...

The Regulatory Czar and Animal Rights

Are animal rights activists one step closer to achieving legal standing for animals to sue?...

Reclaiming the Streets for People

Chris Richards dreams of a life where people aren’t enslaved by automobiles…

From the Stacks: Parabola

Virtually all spiritual traditions give some attention to silence. The spring issue of Parabola, a p...

Content Tools




Post a comment below.

 






Pay Now & Save $5!
First Name: *
Last Name: *
Address: *
City: *
State/Province: *
Zip/Postal Code:*
Country:
Email:*
(* indicates a required item)
Canadian subs: 1 year, (includes postage & GST). Foreign subs: 1 year, . U.S. funds.
Canadian Subscribers - Click Here
Non US and Canadian Subscribers - Click Here

Want to gain a fresh perspective? Read stories that matter? Feel optimistic about the future? It's all here! Utne Reader offers provocative writing from diverse perspectives, insightful analysis of art and media, down-to-earth news and in-depth coverage of eye-opening issues that affect your life.

Save Even More Money By Paying NOW!

Pay now with a credit card and take advantage of our earth-friendly automatic renewal savings plan. You save an additional $5 and get 4 issues of Utne Reader for only $31.00 (USA only).

Or Bill Me Later and pay just $36 for 4 issues of Utne Reader!