Add to My MSN

The Great Republican Sacred Cow

7/11/2011 12:19:43 PM

Tags: taxes, economics, economy, Republicans, Democrats, budget, deficit reduction, deficit, John Boehner, President Obama, Barack Obama, politics, The New Republic, David Doody

taxLast week I wrote a post about what Alison Kilkenny at The Nation has called “the era of the one-sided compromise,” questioning whether the Republican party, both at the state and national levels, could actually compromise on a budget deal that included some sort of new tax revenue. My conclusion was no, they wouldn’t be able to. Which is exactly what played out over the weekend, as Jonathan Cohn writes at The New Republic:

As you have probably heard by now, House Speaker John Boehner on Saturday evening informed President Obama that he was no longer interested in pursuing a “grand bargain” on deficit reduction. It was a major turning point in the debate. For the past week, Obama has made clear that he hoped to use ongoing negotiations over the debt ceiling to put in place a massive, potentially historic deal to reorder the nation’s spending priorities – a deal that would reduce deficits by as much as $4 trillion cumulatively over the next decade. 

This abandonment by Boehner has left Cohn, like so many of us, wondering, “Does anything matter to Republicans more than protecting tax cuts for the very wealthy?” Cohn points out that any “grand bargain” that could have been reached as a result of the current debate would “reflect Republican priorities far more than Democratic ones,” including cuts to Medicare, Medicaid, and Social Security. In other words, the stuff that matters to one side would be represented far more than the stuff that matters to the other. Still, the Republicans can’t stomach the idea of the Bush-era tax cuts for the nation’s wealthiest expiring next year. 

Cohn sees Boehner’s willingness to negotiate as genuine and writes, “For what it's worth, I’ve actually gained some respect for Boehner…[he] was genuinely interested in negotiating a deal even if that meant agreeing to some compromises, albeit pretty modest ones from my perspective.” However, he acknowledges that Boehner’s not really in charge of the House Republican caucus. “The lunatics are,” he writes. “And it looks like they’ve won.”

And while the consensus seems to be shifting somewhat that the Republicans’ inability to touch their no-new-taxes sacred cow is actually the culprit for negotiations breaking down, Jonathan Chait recognizes a failure on the part of the media in reporting on this issue:

The other thing to add is that this demonstrates a fact that media centrists have failed to grasp for months: the impediment to a balanced (or even heavily rightward-tilting) deficit plan isn't "both parties." It's Republicans. Democrats may not like the idea of cutting entitlements, but their objections don't come close to matching the GOP's theological opposition to tax increases.

Source: The New Republic 

Image by Enter The Story, licensed under Creative Commons.  



Related Content

Pink Taxis Provide a Safe, Ladies-Only Ride

Cabs driven by women, for women, help combat stereotypes and harassment in Mexico.…

The New Politics of One-Sided Compromise

While one party makes attempt after attempt, the other party holds steady on a single issue...  

Wealthy Americans Volunteering to Pay Higher Taxes

Here’s a refreshing change of pace: Wealthy people stepping forward and volunteering to pay higher t...

Not an Environmentalist? You Have Lots of Company

Why is it so hard for many people to say that they’re environmentalists? ...

Content Tools




Post a comment below.

 

Michelle Flannery
7/13/2011 4:43:55 PM
There cannot be compromise unless both parties are willing to budge. There is no evidence that our president is willing to budge at all. He is so far left that compromise doesn't move toward the middle, only further to the left. And speaking as an individual on the lower end of the income scale, we should all be paying fair taxes. The burden of taxes should not be on the wealthy simply because they are wealthy. One way or another they earned their wealth. The current administration is spending out of control. If they take from the rich, it won't be long before they're taking from the rest of us.

timsored
7/13/2011 10:10:54 AM
Republicans RUIN the Nation!






Pay Now & Save $5!
First Name: *
Last Name: *
Address: *
City: *
State/Province: *
Zip/Postal Code:*
Country:
Email:*
(* indicates a required item)
Canadian subs: 1 year, (includes postage & GST). Foreign subs: 1 year, . U.S. funds.
Canadian Subscribers - Click Here
Non US and Canadian Subscribers - Click Here

Want to gain a fresh perspective? Read stories that matter? Feel optimistic about the future? It's all here! Utne Reader offers provocative writing from diverse perspectives, insightful analysis of art and media, down-to-earth news and in-depth coverage of eye-opening issues that affect your life.

Save Even More Money By Paying NOW!

Pay now with a credit card and take advantage of our earth-friendly automatic renewal savings plan. You save an additional $5 and get 4 issues of Utne Reader for only $31.00 (USA only).

Or Bill Me Later and pay just $36 for 4 issues of Utne Reader!