Wild Green

Former Utne Reader senior editor Keith Goetzman on environmental issues from climate change to composting.

Add to My MSN

Big, Bad BPA: Now It’s Killing the Lobsters

8/19/2010 3:15:12 PM

Tags: Keith Goetzman, environment, bisphenol A, BPA, health, food, air and water, wildlife, oceans, seafood, science, molecular biology, U Conn Today, Treehugger, Environmental Working Group

BPA lobsterThe chemical bisphenol A is seemingly everywhere—it’s in our receipts, our toys, our food containers, even our bodies—and it’s increasingly suspected as a factor in many health problems. Now the nasty stuff is even in lobsters, and it may be killing them off.

Treehugger tipped us to a story in U Conn Today on the research of Hans Laufer, a molecular biologist who believes that waterborne chemicals including BPA is contributing to the shell disease that is killing off lobsters in Long Island Sound. Laufer, reports U Conn Today, has

found that by interfering with hormones crucial to young lobster growth, chemicals such as bisphenol A can slow the lobsters’ molting patterns and interfere with regular development, leading to body deformations, susceptibility to disease, and potential death.

As for those BPA-laden receipts, Treehugger has some promising news, reporting that three large European grocery chains are planning to phase out BPA in their receipts. The move may add to the momentum to do the same in the United States. In the meantime, wash your hands very well after handling receipts from CVS, Whole Foods, Safeway, the U.S. Postal Service, Walmart, Chevron, McDonalds, KFC, and—get this—the U.S. House of Representatives cafeteria. See the Environmental Working Group’s website for a full breakdown of which receipts are the most, and least, toxic.

Source: U Conn Today, Treehugger, Environmental Working Group

Image by tuppus, licensed under Creative Commons.



Related Content

FDA Might Crack Down on Bisphenol A

The lumbering Food and Drug Administration is finally showing signs of taking action on bisphenol A,...

BPA Alternatives Harder to Find Than WMD

Foodmakers are having a tough time finding alternatives to bisphenol A...

Literary Journal Demands Evidence That America is Actually Literary!

Thanks to a genius change in policy, writers hoping to submit their manuscripts to Tin House now hav...

Four New Reasons to Avoid Bisphenol A

Check your plastic water bottle and cut down your canned-food consumption: The chemical BPA may be e...

Content Tools




Post a comment below.

 

Elizabeth
11/1/2010 1:12:45 AM
Thanks for posting this. I've made a point to avoid BPA for years now, but had no idea about the receipts. Recently, a store offered to email me my receipt, which I gladly accepted. And, even if the research is not peer-reviewed, it makes sense that the public be aware of plausible information that affects our health.

Keith Goetzman
8/20/2010 3:42:00 PM
Carl, I don't consider peer review to be the absolute mark of scientific credibility, let alone the standard for meriting coverage in my blog. The peer review process sometimes has its own conflicts of interest and other pressures. I simply found Laufer's research to be interesting and, frankly, plausible. Plenty of credible (and peer-reviewed) research has shown harmful environmental and health effects from BPA. That's why the FDA is undertaking a big reassessment of the chemical. Keith Goetzman

Carl
8/20/2010 12:25:33 PM
...but this research isn't even published in a peer-reviewed journal yet. It's just preliminary findings gathered for the purpose of soliciting a funding source. Actually, it's more like a hypothesis. Why would the paper, Treehugger, and Utne choose to publish unpublished findings? When its proven to be wrong will you all publish a rebuttal? If you're going to disseminate the data as fact already, why even bother to get the money and do the studies?



Pay Now & Save $5!
First Name: *
Last Name: *
Address: *
City: *
State/Province: *
Zip/Postal Code:*
Country:
Email:*
(* indicates a required item)
Canadian subs: 1 year, (includes postage & GST). Foreign subs: 1 year, . U.S. funds.
Canadian Subscribers - Click Here
Non US and Canadian Subscribers - Click Here

Want to gain a fresh perspective? Read stories that matter? Feel optimistic about the future? It's all here! Utne Reader offers provocative writing from diverse perspectives, insightful analysis of art and media, down-to-earth news and in-depth coverage of eye-opening issues that affect your life.

Save Even More Money By Paying NOW!

Pay now with a credit card and take advantage of our earth-friendly automatic renewal savings plan. You save an additional $5 and get 4 issues of Utne Reader for only $31.00 (USA only).

Or Bill Me Later and pay just $36 for 4 issues of Utne Reader!