For Your Eyes Only: Anti-censorship sites
Web Specials Archives
Laurie Ouellette and Harry Goldstein Utne Reader
Amidst all the controversy surrounding the legislation aimed at
censoring the content of the Internet lies a great nugget of irony:
The Internet itself has become an important tool for
anti-censorship organizations to track freedom of expression
infractions all over the globe.
RELATED CONTENT
Battles over freedom of expression can usually be traced to the
Religious Right's ongoing assault against everything from filmmaker
Marlon Rigg's Tongues Untied to bawdy email jokes. The Institute
for First Amendment Studies claims to be the only nonprofit
educational and research organization focusing solely on the
activities of this irrational but influential group, and the
Institute has made much of its valuable work available for free and
accessible online. AlterNet's
Democratic Values Project
is a comprehensive archive of material used by journalists,
activists, and other people interested in subverting the Right's
definition of what's proper. Besides archiving resources and
alternative press articles on the politics of censorship, the site
hot links to lots of organizations tracking the Right, including
the Center for Democratic Renewal, Feminists for Free Expression,
the National Coalition Against Censorship, People for the American
Way, and the Southern Poverty Law Center. The ACLU Free Reading
Room, a site maintained by the infamous American Civil Liberties
Union, is also notable for its wide collection of
censorship-related documents and legal analysis.
Many of the most contentious censorship fights concern works of
art. The most comprehensive and interactive anti-censorship site
keeping tabs on the art world is The File Room, a huge archive that
spans the globe and features documentation, artists installations,
and opportunities for visitors to report incidents of censorship
directly. What is refreshing about the site, which is maintained by
the Randolph Street Gallery in Chicago, is that dogma gives way to
critical analysis, and visitors are encouraged to make up their own
minds about conflicting claims surrounding a censored work.