Mental Notes

Rethinking and rewriting the psychiatric rulebook
by Rebecca A. Clay, from Monitor on Psychology
November-December 2011
Add to My MSN

Image by Flickr user: Patrick Hoesly / Creative Commons


Content Tools

Related Content

Being an Introvert in an Extraverted World

Introverts haven’t gone away. We’re just quietly dealing with the demands of living in a loud, in-yo...

Mindfulness Fights Eating Disorders

Psychologists are experimenting with mindfulness exercises to fight eating disorders....

Might As Well Face It, You’re Addicted to...the Internet?

In the 90s Internet Addiction was a joke among some. It could soon be a diagnosis.

Utne Reader Heads for South by Southwest

Utne Reader had so much fun at South by Southwest last year that we’re going again. This time out, w...

Lee Anna Clark, a University of Notre Dame psychology professor, jumped at the chance to be involved in crafting the fifth edition of the American Psychiatric Association’s Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-5), due to be published in 2013.

“I saw this as a possible opportunity to see my research have real-world applications,” says Clark, who studies personality disorders and impairment assessment. Clark is one of several psychologists helping with the revision—the first since 1994.

Since the process began in 1999, the DSM-5 task force—and more than a dozen work groups, many of which include practicing psychologists—has been reviewing the current manual’s strengths and weaknesses, perusing the literature, and analyzing data. A draft of the DSM-5 proposes changes to the following categories:

Mood disorders. Add a new category called “temper dysregulation with dysphoria” to help clinicians distinguish between children with symptoms of severe mood dysregulation and those who have bipolar disorder or oppositional defiant disorder.

Suicide. Include new scales for adults and adolescents that may help clinicians identify patients at greatest risk.

Risk syndromes. Add a new diagnostic category called “risk syndromes,” which may help clinicians identify earlier stages of serious mental disorders such as dementia and psychosis.

Addiction. Replace the current categories of substance abuse and dependence with a new category called “addiction and related disorders” and add a new category called “behavioral addictions,” with gambling as its sole disorder.

Eating disorders. Change the criteria for diagnosing anorexia and bulimia. The proposed criteria for anorexia include a heightened focus on behavior, for example. While the DSM-IV’s diagnostic criteria include “refusal” and “fear of weight gain,” the eating disorders work group points out that “refusal” is difficult to assess and that some people with anorexia deny fear of weight gain. Additionally, make binge-eating disorder a freestanding diagnosis.

Learning disorders. Change the names of certain categories within the learning disorders section to bring them in line with international usage. Thus, the reading disorder and mathematics disorder categories become dyslexia and dyscalculia. The draft also recommends the creation of a single diagnostic category—autism spectrum disorders—to replace current diagnoses of autistic disorder, Asperger’s disorder, childhood disintegrative disorder, and pervasive developmental disorder.

In addition to these changes, the DSM-5 draft proposes that “dimensional assessments” be added to diagnostic evaluations of mental disorders. These assessments would allow clinicians to evaluate the severity of symptoms and take into account symptoms that cut across multiple diagnoses.

“We know that anxiety is often associated with depression, for example, but the current DSM doesn’t have a good system for capturing symptoms that don’t fit neatly into a single diagnosis,” says David Kupfer, chair of the DSM-5 task force.

More than 8,000 clinicians, researchers, and family and patient advocates have commented on the draft, and the DSM-5 work groups are reviewing the comments to refine their recommendations. Overall, the APA predicts a fine-tuning of the DSM-IV rather than a complete overhaul.

The revision team has also launched field trials to test some of the proposed criteria in real-world settings. The trials will help ensure that the criteria are easy to understand and that they accurately describe mental illness in ways that help clinicians make sound treatment decisions.

Rebecca A. Clay is a writer based in Washington, D.C. Excerpted from Monitor on Psychology (Jan. 2011), the magazine of the American Psychological Association. Copyright © 2011 by the American Psychological Association. Adapted with permission. www.apa.org/monitor 

168-cover-thumb.jpgHave something to say? Send a letter to editor@utne.com. This article first appeared in the November-December 2011 issue of Utne Reader.


Previous | 1 | 2 | Next






Post a comment below.

 








Pay Now & Save $5!
First Name: *
Last Name: *
Address: *
City: *
State/Province: *
Zip/Postal Code:*
Country:
Email:*
(* indicates a required item)
Canadian subs: 1 year, (includes postage & GST). Foreign subs: 1 year, . U.S. funds.
Canadian Subscribers - Click Here
Non US and Canadian Subscribers - Click Here

Want to gain a fresh perspective? Read stories that matter? Feel optimistic about the future? It's all here! Utne Reader offers provocative writing from diverse perspectives, insightful analysis of art and media, down-to-earth news and in-depth coverage of eye-opening issues that affect your life.

Save Even More Money By Paying NOW!

Pay now with a credit card and take advantage of our earth-friendly automatic renewal savings plan. You save an additional $5 and get 4 issues of Utne Reader for only $31.00 (USA only).

Or Bill Me Later and pay just $36 for 4 issues of Utne Reader!