Add to My MSN

Graduating from Standardized Tests

12/20/2011 4:35:56 PM

Tags: standardized testing, test-optional universities, Pearson Education, education, education reform, mind and body, The Chronicle of Higher Education, Good, Will Wlizlo


Standardized tests are an oft-vilified, cancerous outgrowth on the sickly flesh of 2001’s No Child Left Behind education reform legislation. By shifting the focus of secondary education to preparing students for high-stakes exams, students are incentivized to memorize factoids, formulae, and figures, rather than how to think creatively, form a rational opinion (or sentence), or continue learning outside of a school environment. It as if the Department of Education took on the pedagogic philosophy of Mr. Gradgrind—a boarding school teacher in Charles Dickens’ Hard Times—who is an unwavering advocate of “truth” and empiricism. “Teach these boys and girls nothing but Facts,” Gradgrind pontificates in Hard Times’ opening chapter, “Facts alone are wanted in life. Plant nothing else, and root out everything else. You can only form the minds of reasoning animals upon Facts: nothing else will ever be of any service to them.”

Don’t get me wrong, getting the facts right is important . . . and you’d better hope your teachers sow the Facts in our current system, or you won’t place very well or SAT or ACT exam. Good luck getting into college without a passing score.

And, for that matter, good luck taking a standardized exam that isn’t bankrolled, lobbied-for, manufactured, delivered, and scored by Pearson Education, an international textbook manufacturer with chokehold on American public schools. “To capitalize on this new world order,” we reported in our Jan-Feb 2012 issue, “testing companies are hiring high-powered lobbyists to influence the government’s educational agenda.” Let me spell this out very clearly: The privatization that these lobbyists are pushing changes the institutional goal of public education from knowledge, equality, or progress to money.

Also, had you heard that standardized tests don’t work very well in the first place?

Even if the interests of standardized testing are entrenched, a few good ideas might help chip away at their rote, zombifying intellectual oppression. For the sake of black humor, here are a few of those ideas bouncing around—presented in the form of a multiple-choice question:

What is an effective way to circumvent the standardized testing teaching paradigm?  

  1. Judge students’ aptitude with portfolios instead of test scores – Liz Dwyer, the education editor of Good, proposes a technique that some of the country’s best educators use to judge their students’ progress: an end-of-term portfolio. “[I]s there a misalignment,” Dwyer asks, “between the work they can actually do and what the test questions ask?” Narrowing down a quarter or semester’s worth of academic inquiry into one’s best work, Dwyer argues, will “showcase the pieces they believe reflect the depth and breadth of their capacity” and “is more empowering for students than a single number.” Portfolios are an apt assessment for a modern education, she concludes, because they display “creativity, critical thinking, and project-based learning . . . something no test score can quite do.”
  2. Foster a “test-optional” university culture – One controversial idea, put forth most extensively by Martha Allman in Joseph A. Soares in SAT Wars, encourages universities to conduct more one-on-one interviews and try to eliminate admissions based on test scores (an inherently discriminatory method, according to the book’s authors). As noted in a review of the book for The Chronicle of Higher Education, no matter the benefits, switching from the status quo comes with its share of growing pains. “We could not have anticipated the dramatic increase in workload,” Allman is quoted as writing, “the labor-intensiveness of the process, the challenge of attempting to interview the entire applicant pool, the technical challenges of written online interview options, nor the volume of comment from our constituencies.”
  3. Subvert the traditional university system entirely – “Almost nine out of ten American high school seniors say they want to go to college,” writes Anya Kamentz, the author of DIY U featured in our Sept-Oct 2011 issue, who also notes that “UNESCO concluded that there’s no foreseeable way that enough traditional universities could be physically built in the next two decades to match the demand.” Kamentz puts forth a number of solutions that largely side-step the current system, including open-source coursework, game-based educational software, and hyper-accelerated programs. In other words, breaking down the classroom walls. And if there are no walls, standardized tests can’t keep us hostage.
  4. A combination of a, b, and c. 
  5. None of the above. 

What’s the answer? Hopefully we won’t need to ask Pearson Education.

Sources: The Chronicle of Higher Education, Good 

Image by Renato Ganoza, licensed under Creative Commons. 

Content Tools

Post a comment below.


Tim Malone
1/14/2012 3:19:42 PM
While I agree with what this article is saying, I think it misses the point of standardized tests. This article assumes that test are there to assess students; on the surface this may be true, but I think the true purpose of these tests is to assess the teachers. None of the prescriptions offered address this issue and are thus doomed to fail. Student portfolios would be great, but they offer no method of assessing the performance of teachers. A portfolio offers a great way to assess the student's work, but it assumes the teacher is competent, which is not an assumption that is made by our society. Americans have a strong desire to quantitatively assess the effectiveness of workers (How many units of education did this teacher provide? How many student units did they process this year?). Unfortunately, school funding, teacher assessment, anti-union sentiment, and property tax rates are all intertwined with, and choking, pedagogy.

Stephanie Bustamante
12/28/2011 6:38:02 PM
F. In place of grades, allow the Teacher the time and opportunity to articulate each child's growth through the school year, circumstances where one excelled, felt defeated, shined, helped others. To share specific experiences and perhaps to share what the Teacher has learned from the Student. In short, allow the individuality of each person be the focus rather than a highly suspect form of testing which turns people into products in need of quality assurance testing. Of course, a Teacher would need to be insightful, objective and most importantly interested in each student to some degree. Class size would effect this, as would the reality that most teachers are born out of a public school assembly line and so might need extra training in order to break away from the 'rote' memorization and lack of imagination- which is an obstacle that can be overcome with honest reflection, an open mind and practice.

Pay Now Save $5!

Utne Spring 2016Want to gain a fresh perspective? Read stories that matter? Feel optimistic about the future? It's all here! Utne Reader offers provocative writing from diverse perspectives, insightful analysis of art and media, down-to-earth news and in-depth coverage of eye-opening issues that affect your life.

Save Even More Money By Paying NOW!

Pay now with a credit card and take advantage of our earth-friendly automatic renewal savings plan. You save an additional $5 and get 4 issues of Utne Reader for only $31.00 (USA only).

Or Bill Me Later and pay just $36 for 4 issues of Utne Reader!

(* indicates a required item)
Canadian subs: 1 year, (includes postage & GST). Foreign subs: 1 year, . U.S. funds.
Canadian Subscribers - Click Here
Non US and Canadian Subscribers - Click Here