Add to My MSN

Hands Off My Gender

6/21/2011 5:33:59 PM

Tags: health, emotions, social justice, activism, science and technology, politics, Bioethics Forum, Danielle Magnuson

Gender-neutral-baby-shower-cupcakes 

Where does the story begin? Perhaps in the delivery room, when the doctor hands the newborn baby, still slick with blood and mucus, to the ecstatic parents but isn’t able to say definitively, “It’s a boy” or “It’s a girl.” Or it could start earlier, in the womb, when the cells are dividing like mad to create the many complicated and wondrous parts of a new human being. Perhaps the story really gets going later, when the surgeon slices into the baby’s phallus—considered either a micro-penis or an overlarge clitoris—in the first of many treatments to cosmetically assign a crystal-clear gender. Or maybe the heart of the story is the slow cultivation of shame that comes from the years of secrecy and misinformation that follow infant gender reassignment.

By far the happiest place to dive in, for this particular rendition of the story, is when Jim met Alice Dreger a few months ago and told her: “You saved my life.”

Jim is a 50-year-old man who was born with a disorder of sex development (DSD), formerly known as intersex, formerly known as pseudo-hermaphrodism. Alice is a bioethics professor and advocate of the basic human rights of DSD patients: the right to grow up without devastating cosmetic surgeries that take away sexual sensation or, in some instances, the ability to experience orgasm; the right to know one’s own medical history; the right to make one’s own medical choices.

Alice tells Jim’s story in Bioethics Forum (02/14/2011):

[Jim] was born with ambiguous genitalia—with hypospadias (where the opening of the urethra is on the underside of the penis), with a smaller-than-average penis, and a herniated testicle. Against doctors’ advice, his parents raised him as a boy. The docs of course had recommended sex reassignment, as was standard. His parents did not resist because they were radical; they resisted because they were terrified and young and I’ll bet they didn’t understand why you would take a baby with testicles and make him a girl.

Of the 2,600-some babies born with ambiguous genitals each year in the United States, Jim is among the rare few from his generation who escaped having his sex organs resculpted to look like a vagina. And because of social activists such as Alice and others with Accord Alliance (previously the Intersex Society of North America), he eventually learned that he was not alone—a priceless gift.

Today Jim has some really beautiful things in his life: A wife. A daughter. A doctor who listens to his concerns and helps him make the right choices for his body. And he had the honor of meeting Alice and telling her his story:

He said that he knew, from my Web site, that some people had objected to the move from talking about “intersex” to talking about “disorders of sex development.” But, he said, “I love the new term, DSD.” He said it captured his experience—that what he has is a medical condition. He doesn’t have double sex, or double gender, as people seem to think when they hear the term “intersex.” He has a DSD.

Source: Bioethics Forum 

Image by clevercupcakes, licensed under Creative Commons. 



Related Content

On the American Journalists in North Korea, Wondering About Al Gore

American journalists Euna Lee and Laura Ling were sentenced today to 12 years hard labor in North Ko...

Is the Bible Sexist?

The bible has many parts that ring sexist to modern ears. People are constantly trying to make praye...

Depression Twice as Common as Previously Thought

Depression and anxiety disorders are more common than previously thought. Does that mean more people...

Blogging the Colombia-Ecuador Fracas

News of the diplomatic crisis unfolding in northern South America has been buried by an increasingly...

Content Tools




Post a comment below.

 

Aidan
9/20/2011 3:59:10 PM
"Disorder of sex development" sounds horrible and makes it seem like a sickness. This article was right on some levels ( not putting a baby through surgery, letting an individual decide if surgery is necessary). But why call it disordered? Isn't it natural, like being a twin. Maybe we should just change how we perceive gender in the the first place.

Luccia Rogers
6/27/2011 10:32:29 AM
So, we move from a term that doesn't contain two-gender bias, namely, intersex, to a term that immediately places a relatively common human condition into the realm of illness, wrongness, and "otherness." This is considered positive? One in about 1000 births is intersex to some degree. This has always happened among humans. This may very well always happen. But now, because we are calling this normal variation a, "disorder," the impetus to medically "correct," this normal variation will only become stronger, not weaker.



Pay Now & Save $5!
First Name: *
Last Name: *
Address: *
City: *
State/Province: *
Zip/Postal Code:*
Country:
Email:*
(* indicates a required item)
Canadian subs: 1 year, (includes postage & GST). Foreign subs: 1 year, . U.S. funds.
Canadian Subscribers - Click Here
Non US and Canadian Subscribers - Click Here

Want to gain a fresh perspective? Read stories that matter? Feel optimistic about the future? It's all here! Utne Reader offers provocative writing from diverse perspectives, insightful analysis of art and media, down-to-earth news and in-depth coverage of eye-opening issues that affect your life.

Save Even More Money By Paying NOW!

Pay now with a credit card and take advantage of our earth-friendly automatic renewal savings plan. You save an additional $5 and get 4 issues of Utne Reader for only $31.00 (USA only).

Or Bill Me Later and pay just $36 for 4 issues of Utne Reader!