Utne Blogs > Science and Technology

How Science Hurts Love

 by Bennett Gordon


Tags: science, technology, online dating, love, research, Telegraph, Guardian, BBC News, New Scientist,

Love on the ComputerSociety may be moving toward a more liberated view of love, but people increasingly are shackling themselves with rigid rules and systems when finding partners, Jean Hannah Edelstein writes in the Guardian. Online daters apply “scientific” formulas to their profiles in an effort to home in on the partner of their dreams, often neglecting more frustrating, unscientific, but endlessly fascinating pursuits like “pointless flirting.” 

This methodological approach to love is reinforced, according to Edelstein, by the steady stream of studies designed to illuminate a scientific order to human relationships. After dating a man who looked eerily like her father, Edelstein writes that she was “absolved from responsibility for it” by a recent study suggesting that women are often attracted to men who look like their fathers. Freud may have written about that very idea years ago, but the new findings, reported by the Guardian, are being cited as further evidence of “sexual imprinting,” where sexual attraction in humans is determined early in childhood.

New studies are also pointing to a kind of genetic pre-determinism on love. The New Scientist reports that gene coding could “help to determine whether men are serial commitment-phobes or devoted husbands.” The researchers found that the more copies of a section of the gene RS3 334 that a man has, the less likely he is to remain monogamous. Having pinpointed the genetics of relationships, the team is now trying to test for gene coding in altruism and jealousy.

And even beyond the pages of Cosmo, new studies about how to attract potential mates are released nearly every slow news day. The British newspaper Telegraph has determined that a rollercoaster is the best place for a first date, since the excitement will cause people to release the hormone phenyl ethyl-amine, which is also released when a person first sees someone he or she is attracted to. And the BBC News reports that the simple act of saying “I love you” has the ability to make people more attractive.

The question for Edelstein is: What effect do studies like these have on our relationships? The findings could make dating more efficient, Edelstein writes, saving people time so they could “redirect it towards less sexy, but important undertakings, like recycling and exercise.” People could even sign on to Genepartner.com, a website designed to pair people off based on their genes. But what do people lose? By eliminating potential mates who are blonde, brunette, short, tall, strong, or weak, people cut themselves off from a huge portion of the dating pool, one of whom may be able to surprise them. That’s not a theory. That’s simple statistics.

Image by Steven Orr, licensed under Creative Commons

miss understood
9/24/2008 3:51:45 PM

Greetings Earthlings!!!


colleen brady
9/17/2008 10:38:05 AM

There is a lot of science about attraction. I coach my clients against using the rush of hormones from a rollercoaster in finding Mr. Right or Ms. Right. Hormones fade. In my Find True Love Home Study Course, I coach my clients to discover what true love means to them, not their parents, their peers, TV, or the movies. When you discover your irresistible definition of true love using the metaporical language of love, you become irresistible. http://www.totaltruelove.com


olivia_1
9/15/2008 2:27:50 PM

I understand that people can become desperate in the search for a partner, but spending time reading these studies and setting up on-line dating accounts just cuts time from the posibility of meeting people. Join a club, take a class or just be open to meeting new people...you may find what you are looking for.