The Conspiracy Channel

With a larger staff than Fox News, a worldwide Russian TV network spreads a unique brand of anti-American propaganda


| January-February 2011



conspiracy-channel

Jesse Lefkowitz / www.jesse-lefkowitz.com

Five years ago, Russia Today made its debut as a news network aimed at enhancing Russia’s image in the West. Recently, however, the Kremlin-financed television channel has devoted considerable airtime not only to coverage that makes Russia look good, but also to coverage that makes the United States look bad.

Over the past two years, Russia Today has reported with boosterish zeal on conspiracy theories popular in the resurgent “Patriot” movement, whose adherents typically advocate extreme antigovernment doctrines. Its slickly packaged stories suggest that a legitimate debate is under way in the United States about who perpetrated the September 11, 2001, terrorist attacks, for instance, and about President Obama’s eligibility for high office. It also frequently quotes U.S. extremists as authorities on world events or interviews them at length without asking anything more than softball questions. One British journalist called Russia Today “a strange propaganda outfit” after appearing on a show in which the host injected 9/11 revisionism.

Unlike most U.S.-based Patriot radio shows that do the same, the Moscow-based Russia Today has a large global audience tuning in via cable, satellite, and the Internet. In North America, Europe, and South Africa, some 200 million paying viewers—including a growing number in the United States—have access to the network. In 2009 Nielsen Media Research found that more Washington, D.C., area viewers preferred to watch prime-time news on Russia Today than on other English-language foreign networks such as Deutsche Welle (Germany), France 24, Euronews (France), CCTV News (China), and Al Jazeera English (Qatar). On YouTube, Russia Today ranks among the top 10 news and political channels in subscriber numbers. It has 2,000 employees worldwide, including about 100 in its recently opened Washington, D.C., office. (That makes its staff larger than that of Fox News, which reports a worldwide staff of 1,200, and about half the size of cable news pioneer CNN’s.) Russia Today has launched sister networks in Arabic and Spanish in addition to its flagship English broadcasting service.

Though a spokeswoman declined to give the amount of Russia Today’s annual budget, the Russian government has pumped millions into the network since its inception in 2005.

Kathryn Stoner-Weiss, deputy director of the Center on Democracy, Development and the Rule of Law at Stanford University’s Freeman Spogli Institute for International Studies, says the network’s target audience appears to be second- and third-generation members of the Russian diaspora in the United States and elsewhere, along with foreign investors and international media.

“It’s clearly a pro-Russian perspective; that’s the purpose of Russia Today,” she says. “Sometimes, a pro-Russia perspective involves an anti-somebody-else perspective—and we’re the most useful target at certain times.”

alicethemenace
2/4/2011 11:51:15 PM

russia is my new favorite place... is it really so crazy to doubt our government? it seems rather foolish to be so trusting. It's like a religion for some...the cult-like worship of public figures. it's time for Americans to wake up to the ugly bits of our big brother.


neminis
2/4/2011 5:00:04 PM

Can I be the only one who's noticed the source of this BS?! Southern Poverty Law Center. Here, let me google that for you: http://tinyurl.com/45o3s26


will
2/4/2011 4:09:30 PM

Here we go again with 9/11 lies. The 9/11 Commission co-chairs Thomas Kean and Lee Hamilton are on record stating the Commission was “set up to fail.” This is a fact, and it comes from the Commission chairs. The author probably doesn’t know this, which is shameful, because she falsely believes the whole sordid event has been wrapped up, and all loose ends neatly tied. 9/11 Commission senior counsel, John Farmer states: “...what government and military officials had told Congress, the Commission, the media, and the public about who knew what when — was almost entirely, and inexplicably, untrue." Farmer continues: "At some level of the government, at some point in time … there was a decision not to tell the truth about what happened...The (NORAD) tapes told a radically different story from what had been told to us and the public." Thomas Kean, the head of the 9/11 Commission, concurred: "We to this day don’t know why NORAD told us what they told us, it was just so far from the truth." continued below...


will
2/4/2011 4:07:27 PM

Is it lunacy to wonder why the US Military did not stop a single aircraft over a two hour period, while Rumsfeld was outside the pentagon interfering with medics during an attack on the homeland? http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=R6RG9A0rlhg Yes, a legitimate debate is underway in the United States (and the rest of the world) regarding the September 11, 2001, terrorist attacks. There are very good reasons for this. This is why RT reports it. Because the author doesn’t like the message, she pretends there is nothing to see here, without even looking first. Also, the author states that RT “had reported in October 2009 that a judge would not let New Yorkers vote on whether to launch a new investigation into 9/11.” Yes, that is because it happened. Justice Edward Lehner of the State Supreme Court of New York did exactly that. Here is the link: http://nyccan.org/Decision_Denied.php RT reported an event that happened. The author has a problem with this for what reason? In the meantime, ask yourself how it is possible for the BBC to report the complete collapse of WTC 7, 20 minutes before it actually happened. This is a news story that surely deserves the author’s attention. Or does she believe news networks can be psychic on occasion? Will Vancouver


will
2/4/2011 4:03:49 PM

Here we go again with 9/11 lies. The 9/11 Commission co-chairs Thomas Kean and Lee Hamilton are on record stating the Commission was “set up to fail.” This is a fact, and it comes from the Commission chairs. The author probably doesn’t know this, which is shameful, because she falsely believes the whole sordid event has been wrapped up, and all loose ends neatly tied. 9/11 Commission senior counsel, John Farmer states: “...what government and military officials had told Congress, the Commission, the media, and the public about who knew what when — was almost entirely, and inexplicably, untrue." Farmer continues: "At some level of the government, at some point in time … there was a decision not to tell the truth about what happened...The (NORAD) tapes told a radically different story from what had been told to us and the public." Thomas Kean, the head of the 9/11 Commission, concurred: "We to this day don’t know why NORAD told us what they told us, it was just so far from the truth." continued in next comment...


will
2/4/2011 3:56:50 PM

Here we go again with 9/11 lies. The 9/11 Commission co-chairs Thomas Kean and Lee Hamilton are on record stating the Commission was “set up to fail.” This is a fact, and it comes from the Commission chairs. The author probably doesn’t know this, which is shameful, because she falsely believes the whole sordid event has been wrapped up, and all loose ends neatly tied. 9/11 Commission senior counsel, John Farmer states: “...what government and military officials had told Congress, the Commission, the media, and the public about who knew what when — was almost entirely, and inexplicably, untrue." Farmer continues: "At some level of the government, at some point in time … there was a decision not to tell the truth about what happened...The (NORAD) tapes told a radically different story from what had been told to us and the public." Thomas Kean, the head of the 9/11 Commission, concurred: "We to this day don’t know why NORAD told us what they told us, it was just so far from the truth." continued in next comment...


mike baldwin
1/31/2011 10:07:39 PM

I am as far from a "patriot movement" than anyone, yet when I want to know whats really going on in my own country, I watch RT. I have found our corporate mainstream media in the United States to be full of spin, or garbage about Paris Hilton. RT tells it like it is, and anyone that really keeps up with reality, will see that right away. Our media is fine for those hypnotized or brain-dead, but I just can't stomach it. I see through the spin and sometimes outward lies instantly. Sometimes it's hard to face the truth of what our foreign policy does around the world, but I'd rather deal with reality than pretend like we are always the good guy. The author of this story obviously hasn't researched the problems with the "official story" of what happened on September 11, 2001, and might learn some things if he watched a little more RT!