Acquiring Empathy through Essays

| 10/25/2013 11:28:00 AM

Tags: Literature, Essays,


Essays give us a record of someone else’s consciousness, and successful essayists inspire a sense of empathy in their readers.

I have several friends and relatives with whom I sometimes argue on social media. These are all decent people—loving parents, devoted spouses, supportive friends – but I suspect that many of them think I’m the most ridiculous bleeding heart they have ever met. I have been told more than once that my frequent Facebook or Twitter links to articles and opinion pieces concerned with issues like online misogyny, marriage equality, and racial profiling suggest that I’m obsessed with toeing a politically correct line in order to advertise my own sensitivity and enlightenment. I am, after all, a white heterosexual man.  These aren’t my battles, so why do I seem to take these issues so personally?  The glib answer—and the one I employ most often when people ask—is “decency,” but lately I have been wondering how and why my own sense of empathy has developed the way it has.  The answer, I think, is related to my interest in essays.

I know, I know. I’ve probably lost you. Everyone hates essays. Those five-paragraph compositions we were forced to write in school with topics like “How I Spent My Summer Vacation” or “What Flag Day Means to Me.” And truthfully, I never had much use for them myself when I was younger (in high school, after reading A Tale of Two Cities, we were assigned to write an essay chronicling our own “last words” a la Sydney Carton’s “It’s a far, far better thing…”—I wrote a narrative about mowing the lawn, then burned the bottom of the last page to make it look like I had spontaneously combusted).  Essays, we have been raised to believe, are dull, punishing things to read and to write. 

6/10/2016 6:07:31 AM

Packers and Movers in Hyderabad go to:- Packers and Movers in Bangalore go to:- Packers and Movers in Pune go to:-

6/10/2016 6:06:41 AM

Packers and Movers in Mumbai go to:- Packers and Movers in Delhi go to:- Packers and Movers in Gurgaon go to:-

6/10/2016 6:06:13 AM

Packers and Movers in Chennai go to:- Packers and Movers in Noida go to:- Packers and Movers in Navi Mumbai go to:- Packers and Movers in Thane go to:- Packers and Movers in Ghaziabad go to:- Packers and Movers in Faridabad go to:-

6/10/2016 6:05:38 AM

Packers and Movers in Pune go to:- Packers and Movers in Bangalore go to:- Packers and Movers in Hyderabad go to:- Packers and Movers in Mumbai go to:- Packers and Movers in Gurgaon go to:- Packers and Movers in Delhi go to:-

1/8/2016 3:54:24 AM

Very well written and explained. Enjoyed reading - Please visit for More information about - Packers and Movers in Pune @ Packers and Movers in Hyderabad @ Packers and Movers in Mumbai @

1/8/2016 3:53:54 AM

I love this post. Keep on posting more like this. Packers and Movers in Gurgaon @ Packers and Movers in Bangalore @ Packers and Movers in Delhi @ Packers and Movers in Noida @

1/8/2016 3:53:31 AM

How do you make this kind of article, this was not just detailed it is also resourceful. Packers and Movers in Chennai @ Packers and Movers in Thane @ Packers and Movers in Navi Mumbai @ Packers and Movers in Faridabad @ Packers and Movers in Ghaziabad @

11/29/2014 3:32:52 AM

11/29/2014 3:31:44 AM

[[|External Link]] [][facebook] {}{facebook} ( [] [facebook] {} {facebook} ( (facebook) [ facebook] { facebook} ( facebook) [] {} (

6/24/2014 7:36:55 AM

Poznaj nowe osoby, nie bądź anonimowy i znajdź swoją drugą połówkę nasze jest darmowe dla każdego nastolatka

6/22/2014 6:43:13 AM

I am happy to learn about it and more reliable site then others for education point of view. || ||

6/20/2014 4:59:14 AM

I avait signet ce site afin d’éviter qu’il manque encore. You in no way know whenever you may get into deals with some dishonest audio seller and shed authenticity of your self-composed pieces

6/14/2014 4:52:10 AM

I like your post. You have provided great information in your post. I really liked this site. ,

6/12/2014 5:10:06 AM

Much better without commas. I hope this doesn’t come from one of my essays.

6/11/2014 6:21:13 AM

I really like essays. It certainly explains why I love Vanity Fair and Atlantic Monthly. And I've been thinking a lot about empathy lately. Some of these essays are just spectacular.

5/17/2014 8:36:02 AM

This is really nice post. I found it helpful for my

5/16/2014 2:55:10 AM

This is most interesting post I ever read regarding essays and essay writing. || || || || ||

4/8/2014 7:01:16 AM

I avait signet ce site afin d’éviter qu’il manque encore. You in no way know whenever you may get into deals with some dishonest audio seller and shed authenticity of your self-composed pieces.

3/1/2014 1:05:26 PM

Great informative post thanks for sharing.....

10/29/2013 11:22:34 AM

Yes, aparamo, I think you do make sense, particularly when you talk about the idea that disagreement at least suggests engagement with the ideas offered by the essay. When I teach freshman composition, I always try to convince students that arguing isn't really about "winning" but about "building knowledge." But that's not really the type of argument modeled by TV pundits or talk radio gurus, and it's not really want we get in Facebook discussions with friends from high school, either. Rather, we just get a lot of vitriol and logical fallacies as one side tries to make the other look foolish. But reading essays-- or other forms of nonfiction with literary ambitions-- usually requires more engagement with what's actually being presented (as opposed to a red herring of strawman to dispense with neatly and easily). So hopefully even the reader who disagrees is clear about what she's disagreeing with, and has still thought of the essayist's ideas in significant and meaninful ways.

10/28/2013 2:10:12 AM

Dear William--as a writer of social journalism/social justice memoir/women's issues, I give readership empathy a lot of thought. It worries me that empathy is more ethical than literary in nature. One of the difficulties with the kind of activism I do in my books is that it is based on literary ethics and since empathetic reading is not a tangible thing, it can't be quantified, I'm left wondering whether or not the readers of my book have become empathetic. (empathetic reader loosely defined as a reader whose decision making in the world is affected by and more thoughtful as a result of reading my book.) When a reader opens a book, she is opening herself to a type of decision making which is inherently ethical--she has to decide whether or not she will engage with the stories on offer--and in so doing, she submits to the otherness, to a point of view different from her own. I agree with you in that of course there will be collusions as well as disagreements between the reader's values and those represented within the text. The way I see it, even if there are no collusions but only disagreements, the essayist has done her bit. By the time the reader wholeheartedly disagrees with the author, the writer has already accomplished a huge milestone, which is to engage with the human condition. Do I make sense?

10/27/2013 11:29:12 AM

Nicole-- your comment about engaging the senses reminded me of Cynthia Ozick's essay "She: A Portrait of the Essay as Warm Body," wherein she talks about how the essay "seduces agreement." As you say, nobody likes to be preached at-- I think that's why I don't care for much explicitly political writing right now. I don't think we have a George Orwell-- we don't even have a Christopher Hitchens anymore. The think that critics of creative nonfiction (and I don't really have a problem with that generic label) miss when they accuse us of self-centered navel-gazing is that good nonfiction actually does the exact opposite-- it may begin with the self, but it move outward, gets larger. Yes, Baldwin talks about his father's life and death, but in the same essay he observes "To smash something is the ghetto's chronic need." Good nonfiction isn't self-involved-- in fact, it's a guard against solipsism.

10/26/2013 1:03:51 PM

Dear William, I love this argument, especially in light of that latest finding in the journal journal Science which found that reading literary fiction promotes, “empathy, social perception and emotional intelligence.” The study finds no such correlation in readers of popular fiction or serious nonfiction. But what about creative nonfiction? This study was released during the week of the government shutdown, on the day my sister emails to tell me about her class of chemistry students. She teaches at the alternative high school—the one where teenage girls who get pregnant and want to keep their babies are sent. As she tries to teach them about hydrogen atoms, she stares out across the classroom into the gaping eyes looking back at her with only one concern: will WIC get shut down? What will my baby and I eat? She looked back at them with eyes that answered, not hydrogen. She changed her lesson to one about carbon. Researchers asked study participants to read passages from general nonfiction, popular fiction, and literary fiction and then were asked to fill out a brief survey. After they finished the excerpts the participants took a test that measured their ability to infer and understand other people’s thoughts and emotions. The researchers found, to their surprise, a significant difference between the literary- and genre-fiction readers,” wrote Juliane Chiaet in Scientific American. When my sister told her students what I wrote—Creative nonfiction—they laughed. But that’s just the point. In the gap between creative and nonfiction lies the rub. It is between the words where the imagination happens. The name creative nonfiction is as ridiculous as any attempt to codify genre. But I tell my own students, the ones who don’t bring their babies to class, the one who read War and Peace over the summer, that creative nonfiction is most interested in the in-between of the genres. It is interdisciplinary, hyphenated, bent. In creative nonfiction, you have to gather things up: hydrogen, carbon, diapers, WIC, governments, War and Peace and guide the reader to make a connection by offering a unifying image, a repeating phrase, a story about some kids with kids who are trying to bond with their babies while they learn about covalent bonds. “David Kidd, one of the authors of the study, said that “in popular fiction, really the author is in control and the reader has a more passive role,” wrote Pam Belluck in a blog post for The New York Times. “In literary fiction – Dostoyevsky, for example – “there is no single overarching authorial voice,” he said. “Instead, each character presents a different version of reality and they aren’t necessarily reliable. You have to participate as a reader in this dialectic, which is really something you have to do in real life,’” I told my student, the one who read War and Peace, that creative nonfiction is a kind of dialectic too. You have to inform, argue, persuade like you do in nonfiction. But no one likes to be preached at. So you engage their senses, like you do in fiction and poetry. You associate. You create a scene. You build a whole world for your reader, invite them in, and then tell them that not all governments are created equal. “Mind the gap,” you tell your student, who laughs because he’s been to London. He rode the Metro. He read War and Peace. “Dr. Humphrey, an emeritus professor at Darwin College, Cambridge, said, “I would have thought reading in general” would make people more empathetic and understanding. “But to separate off literary fiction, and to demonstrate that it has different effects from the other forms of reading is remarkable. I think it’s going to generate a lot more research and I hope it’s going to generate some discussion in education,’” Belluck continued. I asked my sister how I could help her students. I live in Flagstaff. She teaches in West Valley, Utah. The great gap of the Grand Canyon divides us. I thought about sending up formula. I thought I had some frozen breast milk tucked away in the back of my freezer. I wrote a letter to the Speaker of the House, explaining about these kids and WIC and some different kids, some with cancer, who were scheduled to be enrolled in clinical trials to combat their cancer. The studies were shut down. The Grand Canyon is shut down. The frozen milk had past its expiration date. My sister said it will be OK, the kids would figure it out. I changed the subject. Ask if she could watch my dog over Christmas. She felt sorry for me. She said yes even though her dog and my dog do not get along. The researchers still have a lot of questions. “There is much that the study does not address: How long lasting could such effects be? Would three months of reading Dickens and Austen produce effects that are larger, smaller or have no effect? Are the differences in scores all attributable to the type of fiction? Would the results hold if the same person read all the different types of material? And would it matter if the literary fiction was particularly difficult? The researchers did not use James Joyce’s “Ulysses” or Thomas Pynchon’s “Gravity’s Rainbow.’” There’s a gap between Dickens and Pynchon or Austen and Joyce. There’s a gap between Tom Clancy and Tom Pynchon. Seamus Heaney and J.K. Rowling. Malcolm Gladwell and Judith Krantz. But creative nonfiction, ridiculous genre title that it has been given, likes the gap. In between is where it revels. It draws out character. It creates a scene. It uses dialogue as much as any literary fiction and uses repetition and association as much as any poet. It reads Science, The Economist and John Boehner’s Twitter Feed. It is always in between, asking the reader to participate in this dialectic, making story out of facts, facts out of story, using the privilege of poetry to get away with it. Creative nonfiction means that I keep trying to figure out how to send some formula to my sister’s students. I emailed her a question about gaps between electrons and the nucleus in hydrogen molecules to see if I could finish the metaphor. She asked her students my question. With babies over their shoulders, or on their laps, or lying on their desks, they began to formulate an answer.