Statistically Speaking, Literature is for Men

| 2/8/2011 12:43:01 PM

Tags: literature, gender bias, writing, statistics, Ruth Franklin, VIDA, arts, The New Republic, Will Wlizlo,

gender-book-statsLiterature, at its pinnacle, strives to reflect the human condition, but it much more often reflects the male condition. At least that’s the conclusion of The New Republic’s Ruth Franklin, who crunched some numbers on whose books are being published, whose tomes are chosen for review, and who’s penning the critiques when they hit the shelves. Franklin found that our litterateurs and cultural arbiters are overwhelmingly male; only about one-quarter of literary books published are written by women. She breaks down her findings:

We looked at fall 2010 catalogs from 13 publishing houses, big and small. Discarding the books that were unlikely to get reviewed—self-help, cooking, art—we tallied up how many were by men and how many were by women. Only one of the houses we investigated—the boutique Penguin imprint Riverhead—came close to parity, with 55 percent of its books by men and 45 percent by women. Random House came in second, with 37 percent by women. It was downhill from there, with three publishers scoring around 30 percent—Norton, Little Brown, and Harper—and the rest 25 percent and below, including the elite literary houses Knopf (23 percent) and FSG (21 percent). Harvard University Press, the sole academic press we considered, came in at just 15 percent.

Unfortunately—and surprisingly—Franklin found that independent and small-run publishers are just as skewed as the bigger publishing houses. “I speculated,” writes Franklin,

that independents—more iconoclastic, publishing more work in translation, and perhaps less focused on the bottom line—would turn out to be more equitable than the big commercial houses. Boy, was I wrong. Granted, these presses publish a smaller number of books in total, so a difference in one or two books has a larger effect on their percentages. Still, their numbers are dismaying. Graywolf, with 25 percent female authors, was our highest-scoring independent. The cutting-edge Brooklyn publisher Melville House came in at 20 percent. The doggedly leftist house Verso was second-to-last at 11 percent. Our lowest scorer? It pains me to say it, because Dalkey Archive Press publishes some great books that are ignored by the mainstream houses. But it would be nice if more than 10 percent of them were by women.

Literary gender disparity, by Franklin’s reckoning, seems to be systemic: the fewer books published with female authors, the fewer books with female authors critically appraised in the press. VIDA, a group that studies gender in contemporary literary arts, charted gender trends in book review sections of magazines and newspapers. Look at Harper’s, Granta, The New York Times Book Review, or even Franklin’s home publication The New Republic, and the stats are depressingly similar. Most that VIDA tabulated from have a similar 2:1 ratio of male to female authors—both as reviewers and as subjects. Franklin even checked her own scorecard and found that only 33 percent of the books she wrote about were written by women.

“As a member of third-wave feminism, growing up in the 1970s and ’80s,” Franklin reflects, “I was brought up to believe we lived in a meritocracy, where the battles had been fought and won, with the spoils left for us to gather. It is sobering to realize that we may live and work in a world still held in the grip of unconscious biases, no less damaging for their invisibility.”

Source: The New Republic 

Image courtesy of VIDA. 

Taylor Swift
12/13/2012 4:26:19 AM

Hi! Life is good busy for you and Life is fun ^^! I think so! __________________ Hobbies: Watch movies on Youtube and Play funny games on. | |

7/29/2011 11:02:43 AM

Thank you for this post, It was a great read which was extremely helpful. Play Your Favorite Game Online on and Friv Game | Kizi Game

6/17/2011 10:58:35 AM

Thank you for this post, It was a great read which was extremely helpful. and |

4/21/2011 11:25:41 PM

informations utiles. Je pense que j'en ai besoin. Je vous remercie |

Susan Macaulay
3/15/2011 2:13:26 PM

Women are under-represented in just about everything except for statistics on violence, rape, poverty, prostitution and abuse:

will conway
2/16/2011 3:25:54 PM

A poorly researched article……suggesting a bias… where are submission comparisons? Wickipedia has 15 to 20 percent of its sourcing referenced by women…… This appears to match the stats of published women in literary circles' Where is the surprise? What is the point of this article?

Ann Waters
2/16/2011 9:09:27 AM

This article is gender biased. Just because there are women who want to be authors, does not mean that they have the talent to be published, nor have interesting thoughts that someone intelligent might want to read. When I choose a book to read, I do not want to hear about the protagonist's choice of designer shoes, the color-coordinating decor in the office or comments negating some guy's choice of a cowboy chair. I want to read about the "human" condition, not the "female" condition. Few women authors write on that level. We don't need more published female authors, we need to have more quality writers get published, whatever their gender.

Kit Kellison
2/8/2011 7:35:39 PM

It would be very helpful to know how many books are being submitted by women in comparison to men so we might have a more accurate idea about what is going on here.

Kit Kellison
2/8/2011 7:35:30 PM

It would be very helpful to know how many books are being submitted by women in comparison to men so we might have a more accurate idea about what is going on here.

Pam Parker
2/8/2011 5:15:55 PM

With all the talk about the disparity in publishing for female authors, I wonder, what if book clubs (predominantly female in the US) only selected books by women authors?