To read more about rediscovering your singing voice, visit Utne.com/Sing.
I have been watching, in amazement, the cartoon Wonder Pets on the Nickelodeon children’s television channel.
Demonstrating the benefits of teamwork, Linny the guinea pig, Tuck the turtle, and Ming-Ming the duckling (Ming-Ming is everyone’s favorite, and mine, too) save an animal in trouble—sometimes a dolphin, sometimes a monkey, sometimes a bee—in every episode, and feats of great collaboration are always required.
But it’s not just the photo-puppetry animation, the message of teamwork, or the humor of the cartoon that’s engaging; it’s also the fact that the characters are always singing. It’s practically an opera for toddlers, but with a lot more recitative and not too many grand arias.
As the three creatures sing, answer distress calls by phone, and travel far away and sometimes through time, they are accompanied by a score written by current composers and played by an orchestra. The score climaxes every now and then in the Wonder Pets refrain: “What’s gonna work? Teamwork! What’s gonna work? Teamwork!” It’s an awesome achievement to set an entire cartoon series to music and to employ the voices of three young children. Deservedly, Wonder Pets won an Emmy award for music direction and composition in 2008.
Even in our wildest dreams as parents, however, we can’t imagine that Wonder Pets is going to grow an appreciation of singing, never mind opera, in our children. It’s just another passive experience that they sit through. Parents realize this, but we don’t need to worry about it in the toddler years because there is no lack of singing and play in children’s lives at that stage.
Singing is one of the first things that parents do with babies when they are born, and parents are constantly singing to toddlers: wordless ditties, choruses and refrains, made-up rhyming songs, anything to comfort them or engage with them. Parents sing, sing, sing in the early years of children’s lives—and then it stops.
What happens? Once children are at school age, after a toddlerhood of joy in singing, parents begin to consider their musical ability, they look into the future, ambition sets in, music lessons enter stage left, and suddenly, without anyone noticing it, singing has been dealt a critical blow. It is instrumental lessons that children are sent to. Piano, clarinet, fiddle, whatever. Parents suddenly emphasize playing an instrument, as if singing wasn’t substantial enough. Instruments are purchased, music stands are put up, practice is required, and slowly that natural instinct to sing out at the drop of a hat is left behind.
Will singing reappear in the family? Will the songs children learn at school be sung at home? Will their urge to sing, if it is strong enough, find an outlet in a band or a choir when they are teenagers? We don’t know, but by demoting singing when children are so young, we have suggested a trend for life. It is symbolic that the rise of the garage band has occurred as the practice of singing at home has waned. What does it say when the urge to sing or play music means that you end up in the coldest room in the house?
Perhaps singing has been taken for granted. It doesn’t require money, and, unlike instrumental ability, which we generally consider can be learned through practice, we often presume that you either have a voice or you don’t. Our language is full of phrases that inhibit our singing—“she’s tone deaf,” “he doesn’t have a note in his head,” “I never had a voice.” Very few people are actually tone deaf. Being able to sing in tune is little more than a matter of practice.
The lack of emphasis on singing in society means that, well, there is none. Nobody knows the lyrics to anything. Sing-alongs often require a laptop to Google the lyrics. The merry singing after the pub is an endless line of half choruses repeated and then abandoned. At the same time, sing-alongs have become such a rarity that those who have songs, who have learned them, are rarely asked to sing. Society—the bulk of it—has become shy about singing. The spontaneous song becomes the lesser-spotted vocal. Family occasions that cry out for a song—not just weddings and funerals, but also lunches and dinners—are bereft of the practice of calling for hush and asking the one or two in the family who are known to have a voice to release it. Do we know today if any of our nearest or dearest even have a voice?
There is no easy solution to this. Music clearly needs a champion in the home. The sheer variety of aural and visual entertainment available to us presents a formidable challenge. We spend a lot of our time singing and humming along to songs from a digital source. We need to show children that a song is not merely something you consume, but something that you can produce.
From the Journal of Music (Aug.-Sept. 2009), a new Ireland-based magazine that breaks the stale mold of music periodicals by covering a wide range of music—from classical to folk to pop—with depth and intelligence. Most of its stories are written by composers and musicians.
www.journalofmusic.com
As a music venue owner, I have noticed an upsurge in the singer-songwriter phenomenon of late and a slide in the popularity of the garage rock genre. However, both genres frame their songs around the voice. If garage is more amenable to a voice less constrained by the bounds of the major scale, that style of song-structure is still heavily dependent on lyrics, whether or not their presentation is to your taste. But there is, unfortunately, something to be overcome in our society, by those who dare to lift their voices. I've seen my son's voice crushed by his paternal grandmother's assessment of his musicality and have had many similar experiences myself, from my own family growing up. Both of us, by the way, now play and sing professionally. Is it a case where the nail who sticks up will get hammered down? Or have we all just gotten too far (whether by time or space) from our native lands where everyone is expected and encouraged to sing? Don't get me started on dancing!
I understand where the author is coming from, however I have to disagree with his general thesis. I find that singing has experienced a societal resurgence in recent years. We need only consider the infamous show "American Idol" (and its counterparts world-wide) to establish how the "untrained" voice has become a commodity. Instantly, anyone, regardless of musical background, now has this glimmer of hope in becoming famous from an innate artistic skill - the voice. The popularity of this one show (stemming ultimately from the concept "hey, I could do that!") has fueled myriad ways in which those at home can participate, rediscover their own voice: karaoke, video games, youtube etc. So, I believe amateur singing has made a comeback. Furthermore, the observation that "parents sing, sing, sing in the early years of children’s lives—and then it stops" is more a function of children acquiring language skills rather than parents dismissing the benefits of singing. Before children can speak, music is the surrogate language. Parents sing to soothe because a baby who cannot understand in words "go to sleep now, everything will be ok," or "hey, we're playing, let's have fun!" Being a professional classical musician myself (I play the oboe) I agree that singing shouldn't stop in the lives of children, but I am just offering an explanation for why it does (I do not believe it is a matter of parental disregard, or that feeling that instruments serve as more esteemed substitutions).
I understand where the author is coming from, however I have to disagree with his general thesis. I find that singing has experienced a societal resurgence in recent years. We need only consider the infamous show "American Idol" (and its counterparts world-wide) to establish how the "untrained" voice has become a commodity. Instantly, anyone, regardless of musical background, now has this glimmer of hope in becoming famous from an innate artistic skill - the voice. The popularity of this one show (stemming ultimately from the concept "hey, I could do that!") has fueled myriad ways in which those at home can participate, rediscover their own voice: karaoke, video games, youtube etc. So, I believe amateur singing has made a comeback. Furthermore, the observation that "parents sing, sing, sing in the early years of children’s lives—and then it stops" is more a function of children acquiring language skills rather than parents dismissing the benefits of singing. Before children can speak, music is the surrogate language. Parents sing to soothe because a baby who cannot understand in words "go to sleep now, everything will be ok," or "hey, we're playing, let's have fun!" Being a professional classical musician myself (I play the oboe) I agree that singing shouldn't stop in the lives of children, but I am just offering an explanation for why it does (I do not believe it is a matter of parental disregard, or that feeling that instruments serve as more esteemed substitutions).
Thank you for this most profound observation. I was fortunate my mother remained a house singer throughout my youth and I, thanks to her, was good enough not to be self conscious whenever I wanted to break into song. Now my adult son does so on occasion as well and he must have gotten it from me because I can barely recall his mother singing at all. I believe singing, speaking, playing music and reading aloud are all beneficial to a baby three months before birth and a long time after. If only we could get this information to newlyweds. Blessings X 10, Ed
I blame recorded music for the dearth of home-made. In much the same way that junk food has invaded the pantry, and only 'foodies and fanatics' actually cook, so has recording undermined the natural internal tune that we all carry. There still are families filled with music, but they are rare, and the children often expected to be 'famous' due to their natural desire to play... One of the best remedies is silence. Without it, the quiet inner tune is overwhelmed and lost forever. Peter Fraterdeus (Irish Fiddler, Guitarist and infamous 'noodler') fraterdeus.com slowprint.com