Presidential-medal-of-freedomThis article was originally published at 


We still don’t know if he did it or not, but if Bradley Manning, the 24-year-old Army private from Oklahoma, actually supplied WikiLeaks with its choicest material -- the Iraq War logs, the Afghan War logs, and the State Department cables -- which startled and riveted the world, then he deserves the Presidential Medal of Freedom instead of a jail cell at Fort Leavenworth.

President Obama recently gave one of those medals to retiring Secretary of Defense Robert Gates, who managed the two bloody, disastrous wars about which the WikiLeaks-released documents revealed so much.  Is he really more deserving than the young private who, after almost ten years of mayhem and catastrophe, gave Americans -- and the world -- a far fuller sense of what our government is actually doing abroad?

Bradley Manning, awaiting a court martial in December, faces the prospect of long years in prison.  He is charged with violating the Espionage Act of 1917.  He has put his sanity and his freedom on the line so that Americans might know what our government has done -- and is still doing -- globally.  He has blown the whistle on criminal violations of American military law.  He has exposed our secretive government’s pathological over-classification of important public documents.

Here are four compelling reasons why, if he did what the government accuses him of doing, he deserves that medal, not jail time.

Lise Hedstrom
8/11/2011 9:57:00 PM

In 1972 the retired Army officer from whose office Dr. Daniel Ellsberg took the Pentagon Papers confirmed that, yes, "the American people had the right to know." That should be true today.

Lise Hedstrom
8/11/2011 9:50:04 PM

In 1972 the retired Army officer from whose office the Pentagon Papers were taken by Dr. Daniel Ellsberg confirmed that the American people "had the right to know." That should be true today.

Facebook Instagram Twitter