How Bush Won The 2004 Presidential Election

| August 4, 2003

'Purging voter lists is just the beginning: the U.S. has embraced a form of electronic voting that is unreliable, unverifiable and funded by the radical Christian right,' writes Toronto-based journalist Sandeep S. Atwal, on his weblog Atwal is just one of a growing chorus of voices charging that the move to electronic touch-screen voting machines is a bad idea. 'Voting machines are just as subject to program bugs as other computers, and very tempting for computer hackers,' warns David Dill, a Stanford computer scientist and founder of, who is leading a campaign to fight the spread of touch screen voting machines across the country. Just three companies make the machines that will report most of the 2004 election results -- Diebold, Sequoia, and ES&S, the latter of which is owned in part by Sen. Chuck Hagel (R-Nebraska). Many irregularities have already been reported in states that used touch screens in 2002. 'If [the critics'] charges are true, and there is little evidence to contradict their claims,' says Atwal, 'George W. Bush has already won the 2004 election.'
-- Leif Utne

Go there>>How George W. Bush Won The 2004 Presidential Election

Related Links:

Pay Now Save $5!

Utne Summer 2016Want to gain a fresh perspective? Read stories that matter? Feel optimistic about the future? It's all here! Utne Reader offers provocative writing from diverse perspectives, insightful analysis of art and media, down-to-earth news and in-depth coverage of eye-opening issues that affect your life.

Save Even More Money By Paying NOW!

Pay now with a credit card and take advantage of our earth-friendly automatic renewal savings plan. You save an additional $5 and get 4 issues of Utne Reader for only $40.00 (USA only).

Or Bill Me Later and pay just $45 for 4 issues of Utne Reader!

Facebook Instagram Twitter

click me