Indymedia

Reinventing the news


| January / February 2003


A crucial moment in media history took place in 1991, when a private citizen with a camcorder taped three L.A. cops brutally beating an African American man named Rodney King. Thirteen months later, when a suburban jury acquitted the officers, Los Angeles erupted in riots, and activists around the world saw the power of video as a source of information and a tool of direct action.

Seattle saw the full potential of this new age of media in 1999 during protests against the World Trade Organization. By then, activists had taken to the streets equipped not only with video cameras, but with cell phones and laptop computers. Thanks to the Web, their images of riot police shooting rubber bullets at demonstrators was seen around the world—and directly contradicted the Seattle police chief’s denial of the fact on major network news shows.

As Anita Hayhoe notes in the University of Toronto’s Ryerson Review of Journalism, the phenomenon of protesters armed with media capacity—known as Indymedia, short for the Independent Media Centers (IMC) that have sprang up around the world—had arrived. “Mainstream news organizations like CNN and Reuters linked to the [Seattle] IMC Web site,” she adds. By the time the Battle of Seattle had ended, the group’s local site had gotten about 1.5 million hits.

There are now more than a hundred Indymedia branches connected through the IMC’s main site, including bases in Uruguay, India, and Nigeria. Operating on the basic premise of “open publishing”—that every reader is also a reporter—Indymedia allows users to instantly post their stories on the Internet, print, audio, and video, without any editing or filtering.



Like the New Journalism practiced by Tom Wolfe in the 1960s and alternative journalism pioneered by underground newspapers, the Indymedia movement scoffs at the idea of “objective” reporting. One goal of the movement is to encourage people to question their assumption that the mainstream media delivers unbiased news. “We believe that complete objectivity is impossible,” says Kevin Smith, founder of the Ontario IMC. “So all journalism is propaganda to some extent. We try to be honest about our biases, unlike the corporate media.”

But some would argue that Indymedia has its own credibility problems. While the open publishing system allows a freedom unavailable in mainstream media, many readers are turned off by inaccurate or offensive postings. Indymedia proponents reply that readers also have a means to voice their concerns by adding comments to any article on the site.














Pay Now Save $5!

Utne Summer 2016Want to gain a fresh perspective? Read stories that matter? Feel optimistic about the future? It's all here! Utne Reader offers provocative writing from diverse perspectives, insightful analysis of art and media, down-to-earth news and in-depth coverage of eye-opening issues that affect your life.

Save Even More Money By Paying NOW!

Pay now with a credit card and take advantage of our earth-friendly automatic renewal savings plan. You save an additional $5 and get 4 issues of Utne Reader for only $40.00 (USA only).

Or Bill Me Later and pay just $45 for 4 issues of Utne Reader!




Facebook Instagram Twitter flipboard


Copyright 2018, All Rights Reserved
Ogden Publications, Inc., 1503 SW 42nd St., Topeka, Kansas 66609-1265