Is Lucre Really That Filthy?

It?s time for activists to shed their distaste for the dollar

| July / August 2003

Nothing so vividly describes my brief and confusing stint as a revolutionary in the latter half of the ?70s as the lingering recollection of feeling enthusiastic and proud about being broke.

My $50-a-week job editing the local co-op newspaper left me with money for rice and beans after the rent was paid, but not much else. Of course, my young comrades weren?t exactly rolling in the dough, either. But that was OK, because we didn?t need filthy lucre. We?d constructed an entire community around the idea of voluntary poverty, a bubble in the local economy that contained all our wildest sociopolitical fantasies. We had community-controlled food co-ops, worker-owned restaurants and clothing stores, co-op housing, and a people?s clinic, everything good revolutionaries needed to sustain themselves for the long battle ahead. Everything except money.

This distaste for the dollar, of course, was nothing new. Yippies Jerry Rubin and Abbie Hoffman made headlines in the ?60s by scattering bills on the floor of the New York Stock Exchange and starting a near riot. In Howl!, Allen Ginsberg wrote of burning all his money in a wastebasket.

Ginsberg, of course, sold his papers to Stanford University for nearly a million bucks. And though my literary output will never attract that much attention, I have somehow managed over the years to attain a life that, in the parlance of my former comrades, can only be called bourgeois. I own a house, for instance, and a car. It is, by almost any measure, a comfortable life?in many ways the kind of life coveted by the very people my former anti-bourgeois comrades and I were fighting to ?liberate.?

This irony was often lost on the revolutionaries of my day, a point made bluntly by Theodore Roszak in his seminal 1969 book, The Making of a Counter Culture: ?What, after all, does social justice mean to the outcast and dispossessed? Most obviously, it means gaining admission to everything from which middle-class selfishness excludes them.? Then, as now, progressives needed to deal with their own phobias about money if they really wanted to do the work of social change for any length of time?and with any degree of success. If you insist on embracing poverty in your own life, how do you become a credible advocate for folks who would do almost anything to escape it?

?Too many progressives look at money as inherently tainted,? writes Farai Chideya in a recent column for the online alternative news site AlterNet. ?We play a game of keep-away, bragging about who?s broke. Meanwhile, urban pop culture has no compunction about acknowledging the value of money. Many activists who presume to speak for the urban ?underclass? talk about upending the economic system, as if that?s what most people want. If our economy is a sinking ship, many would settle for a berth on the upper decks.?

Pay Now Save $5!

Utne Summer 2016Want to gain a fresh perspective? Read stories that matter? Feel optimistic about the future? It's all here! Utne Reader offers provocative writing from diverse perspectives, insightful analysis of art and media, down-to-earth news and in-depth coverage of eye-opening issues that affect your life.

Save Even More Money By Paying NOW!

Pay now with a credit card and take advantage of our earth-friendly automatic renewal savings plan. You save an additional $5 and get 4 issues of Utne Reader for only $40.00 (USA only).

Or Bill Me Later and pay just $45 for 4 issues of Utne Reader!

Facebook Instagram Twitter